Finding the unknown resistor using only an ohmmeter

  • Thread starter Thread starter abeilleqc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistor
AI Thread Summary
To identify the odd resistor among 12, where 11 are 1 ohm, the most efficient method involves strategic measurements. Initially, split the resistors into two groups of six and measure one group in series; if the resistance is 6 ohms, the odd resistor is in the other group. Next, divide the group containing the odd resistor into two sets of three and measure again; if the resistance is 3 ohms, the odd resistor is in the other set. Finally, connect two resistors in series and one in parallel with a known 1-ohm resistor to determine which one is the odd resistor based on the measured equivalent resistance. This method can potentially identify the odd resistor in as few as three measurements.
abeilleqc
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Finding the unknown resistor using only an ohmmeter

In a box there are 12 resistors, 11 of them have a resistance of exactly 1 ohm, and 1 of them doesn't. Using only an ohmmeter, what's the least measurements you can make to find out which one is the odd resistor and what's its value? (You can't count on luck!)

Equations:
For resistors in series: R(equivalent) = R1+R2+R3+...
For resistors in parallel: 1/R(equivalent)=1/R1+1/R2+1/R3+...

I got to 5 by deviding them up into 2 sets of 6, then measuring the resistance of each one (2 measurements). That would give me R. Then I would get 2 groups of 3 and measure one of them (3 measurements). If I get 3 ohm I know the odd resistor is in the other group. Then I measure the resistance of 2 of the 3 and finally find the odd one (5 measurements).

I'm pretty sure there's a better way... :smile: and I think I should be playing with the series/parallel concept, but I couldn't find anything better than 5... Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, I came up with a similar method:

1) Split into 2 piles of 6, and wire them up all in parallel. If you get 1/6 the resistor is not in the pile, and if you get something different then it is.

2) Take the 6 and split it into 3 and 3. Wire them up in series. If you get 3 then the resistor is not in the pile, if you get something else then it is.

3) Take two of the resistors and put them in series. If you get 2 then the resistor is the one you haven't hooked up, and you're done! If not you have to look between the two and find which one is the odd resistor.

So possibly in 3, but definitely in 4.

There may be a better way yet, but it's late and can't think as well. You definitely want to eliminate half of them, which requires one step, and once you have 6 you may be able to do something clever.
 
Last edited:
You only need 3 measurements.

  • Split the resistors in 2 sets of 6 and connect each set in series. Measure one of the set. If you get 6 \Omega the odd resistor is on the second set.
  • Take the set that has the odd resistor and split it in 2 sets of 3 and connect each set in series again. Measure one set. If you get 3 \Omega the odd resistor is on the second set.
  • Take the set with the odd resistor and connect two resistors, say R_1,R_2 in series and the 3rd one R_3 parallel with the two ones. Then take one resistor from the other set, which you know that it's resistance is 1 \Omega and connect it parallel with R_1 and measure the system. Now you have 3 possibilities: the odd resistor is R_1 or R_2 or R_3.
    Calculate the equivalent resistance of each possibility and you will see that they are different, since R_{odd}\neq 1 \Omega. Depending of the result of the 3rd measurement you can decide which of R_1,R_2,R_3 is the odd resistor and find it's resistance.
 
Thank you! ^-^v
How did you come up with that? (I'm just curious :) I've been thinking about this for ages...)
 
Last edited:


i don't understand...doesnt that mean you can get different values for R_1, R_2, and R_3? am i missing something simple?
 


I actually heard the answer was 1... haha I have no idea...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top