Finding the value of the coefficient of elasticity for a 1D collision.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of elasticity for a 1D collision between two bodies of different masses, where two-thirds of the kinetic energy is lost. The participants derive three key equations based on conservation of momentum, kinetic energy loss, and Newton's law of restitution. They find that their calculations consistently yield negative values for the coefficient of elasticity, indicating a possible error in their approach. By substituting expressions derived from their equations, they can solve for the coefficient of elasticity accurately. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful algebraic manipulation to avoid sign errors in the calculations.
Lemansky
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all first post. Myself and my friends are very much stumped by this question. Any help would be much appreciated!

Homework Statement



A body with mass m collides directly with a body of mass 3m. If two thirds of the original kinetic energy is lost, find the coefficient of elasticity for this collision.



Homework Equations



Conservation of momentum: m1u1+ m2u2=m1v1+m2v2.

Newton's empirical law: v2-v1= -e(u2-u1)

Loss in kinetic energy: (1/2)m1(u1)^2+(1/2)m2(u2)^2=(1/2)m1(v1)^2+(1/2)m2)v2)^2.



The Attempt at a Solution



Using all the info given and giving the sphere of mass m initial velocity u and final velocity v1, and the sphere of mass 3m initial velocity of 0 and a final velocity of v2 we derived three equations, as follows,

1) u=v1+3v2 from the conservation of momentum.

2)u^2=3(v1)^2+9(v2)^2 from the fact that the final kinetic energy equals a third of the initial kinetic energy,

3)(v2-v1)/e =u from rearranging Newton's empirical law.


By squaring out equation 1 and setting it equal to equation 2 we found that v1=3v2.

No matter which way we approached the problem the same equations always fell out and by juggling them around we were able to get values for e with one problem, they were always negative (but had they been positive they would have been realistic). We are probably making some simple mistake with signs or we're cancelling out somehting which can't be canceled but we really are stuck.


Any help much appreciated!:smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From the equations you derived, you can solve for the coefficient of elasticity. From equation 1, you have v1 = u-3v2, and from equation 3, you have u = (v2-v1)/e. Substituting the expression for v1 into equation 3 and rearranging, you get e = (v2-u+3v2)/u = (4v2-u)/u. Using the expression for u from equation 2, you can substitute it into the equation for e and solve for v2. Then, substitute the expression for v2 into the equation for e to get your answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top