Finding Torque and Force for a Car w/ Two People

  • Thread starter Thread starter aflowernamedu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Torques
AI Thread Summary
To find the forces on the car's wheels, the total weight of the car and passengers must be balanced by the reactions at the wheels. The calculations show that the force on the back wheels is 2.09 kN, but the force on the front wheels needs to be determined to reach the total of 8000 N. By applying static equilibrium principles, the sum of vertical forces must equal zero, allowing for the calculation of the unknown force on the front wheels. The moment about one set of wheels can also be used to solve for the other forces. The correct approach involves setting up equilibrium equations for both forces and torques to find the unknown reactions accurately.
aflowernamedu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Torques and Forces?

I have found the first force,but I am not sure how to find the second :/.

Two people sit in a car that weighs 8000N. The person in front weighs 700N, while the one in the back weighs 900N. Call L the distance between the front and back wheels. The person on the front is sitting L/3 back from the front wheels. The person on the back is sitting L/2 back from the PERSON ON THE FRONT. The car's center of gravity is a distance .400L behind the front wheels. How much force does each front wheel and each back wheel support if the people are seated alone the centerline of the car?

Ok so I did:
900 X 5/6L +700/3= F2
F2 =983
8000X .4L
3,200 L

3,200+983=4183
4183/2 = 2091/1000 = 2.09 KN

The book states the answers are 2.09 KN and 2.71 KN. How do I find 2.71??

 
Physics news on Phys.org


For the car to be in static equilibrium, the sum of the reactions at the wheels must equal the weight of the car and the passengers. Simultaneously, the moment of the reactions and the weights about one set of wheels or the other must equal zero. If you write these equilibrium equations, they can be readily solved for the unknown reactions at the wheels.
 


What you did was to sum the torques about the front wheel to get the force on the back wheels. For the weight on the front wheels do you can sum the torques about the back wheel or you can just use the fact that the sum of the vertical forces is zero and at this point the only unknown vertical force is the force on the front tires, one equation in one unknown.
 

Attachments

  • torques185.jpg
    torques185.jpg
    21.8 KB · Views: 689
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top