Finding total angular momentum qnumber for 3d4d

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating total angular momentum quantum numbers for electrons in specific energy levels, specifically for configurations 3d and 4d. It confirms that having five values for L, ranging from 0 to 4, is acceptable, leading to ten possible combinations of total angular momentum J when considering both L and S. The user seeks clarification on spectroscopic notation and its implications, particularly regarding the feasibility of certain states like 5P0, which appears impossible due to conflicting quantum numbers. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the definitions of quantum numbers and their relationships in atomic physics. Overall, the user is validating their calculations and understanding of angular momentum in quantum mechanics.
linda300
Messages
59
Reaction score
3
Hey,

I've been able to do most of these problems but at this point I stopped because it gives 5 values for L and I just wanted to double check it is correct.

L = 2+2,...,2-2 = 4,3,2,1,0

S = 1,0

then you have to evaluate J for each L and S which will give 10 possibilities.

It's a pretty small question but, is it ok to have 5 values for L?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi linda300! :smile:

Can you provide some more information?

What do you mean by a "qnumber"?
What do you mean by "3d4d"?
What do you mean by an L-number? Do you mean an angular momentum?
What do you mean by an S-number?
What do you mean by J?

I guess I didn't learn from the same book you're doing now and I may be used to different symbols and definitions.
I'll adjust to the symbols you are using, but I will need their definitions.
 
oh sorry,

i've read a few books which used wither L or l' notation for angular momentum,

qnumber i meant quantum number but i thought it might not fit in the heading,

3d4d means one electron at n=3, l=2 and one at n=4,l=2

S total spin= s1+s2, s1+s2-1,...,|s1-s2|

J total angular momentum= L+S, L+S-1,...,|L-S|

I think it's fine to have 10 different combinations they all look good,

However I do have another question related to this,

Spectroscopic notation is 2S+1XJ
Where X is the angular momentum according to below
If X= S, P, D, F, G, H...
Then L= 0 , 1, 2, 3, 4, 5...

Take 5P0 for example. so S=2, L=1 and J = 0

But according to S=2, L=1, J=3,2,1. so this state is impossible right? Also consider 3D1 S=1, L=2, J=1 which is possible,

Since S=1 does this mean that there must be 2 optically active electrons?

I think that's right but i just wanted to double check,

Thanks for answering
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top