Finding Upper and Lower Bounds for Speed in km/h

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomas49th
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound
AI Thread Summary
To find the upper and lower bounds of Martin's speed in km/h, the distance of 400 meters is converted to kilometers, resulting in 0.4 km, with bounds of 0.400005 km and 0.399995 km due to rounding. The time of 1 minute is converted to hours, yielding bounds of approximately 0.016528 hr and 0.0168055 hr. The upper bound of speed is calculated as 0.400005 km divided by the lower bound of time, resulting in approximately 24.20 km/h. The lower bound of speed is found by dividing 0.399995 km by the upper bound of time, yielding about 29.75 km/h. The calculations confirm that the correct bounds for Martin's speed are between these two values.
thomas49th
Messages
645
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Martin won the 400 metre race in a time of 1 minute
The time was correct to a tenth of a second
The distance was correct to 1cm

Find the upper and lower bounds of Martin's speed in km/h

Homework Equations


Speed = distance over time


The Attempt at a Solution


400 = 0.4km to 1 cm it's 0.4005 or 0.3995
1 second = 0.00277777777777 hours

how do I find the upper and lower bounds for a tenth of a second from the number above (it's recurring).

THe upper bound of speed = upper bound of distance/lower bound of time
The lower bound of speed = lower bound of distance/upper bound of time

Thanks
:cool:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thomas49th said:

Homework Statement


Martin won the 400 metre race in a time of 1 minute
The time was correct to a tenth of a second
The distance was correct to 1cm

Find the upper and lower bounds of Martin's speed in km/h

Homework Equations


Speed = distance over time


The Attempt at a Solution


400 = 0.4km to 1 cm it's 0.4005 or 0.3995
1 second = 0.00277777777777 hours
You've misplaced a decimal position. If the distance is "correct to the nearest cm"- i.e. rounded to the nearest centimeter, then it could be as much as 400 m+ .5 cm= 400 m+ .005 m= 400005 m = .400005 km. Similarly, if could be as low as 400m- .005 m= 399.995 m= .499995 km.

For the "nearest tenth of a second", the true time could be as low as 1 min+ .5 second= 1 min+ .008333 min= 1.008333 min= 0.0168055 hr or as low as 1 min- .5 second= 1 min- .008333 min= .99166 min= .016528 hr.

how do I find the upper and lower bounds for a tenth of a second from the number above (it's recurring).

THe upper bound of speed = upper bound of distance/lower bound of time
The lower bound of speed = lower bound of distance/upper bound of time

Thanks
:cool:
You don't need to get an exact value do you?
"The upper bound of speed = upper bound of distance/lower bound of time"
so .400005 km/.016528 hr= 24.20 km/hr
"The lower bound of speed = lower bound of distance/upper bound of time"
so .499995 km/0.0168055 hr = 29.75 km/hr.

If you do need the exact value then leave the numbers in fraction form.
The maximum distance is 400.005 m= 0.400005= 400005/1000000 km and the minimum distance is .49995= 499995/1000000 km.
The minimum time is 1- (1/2)/60= 1- 1/120= 119/120 min= 119/7200 hr and the maximum time is 1+ (1/2)/60= 1+ 1/120= 121/120 minutes= 121/7200 hr.

The upper bound on speed is (400005/1000000)(7200/119)= 2880036/11900000 km/hr while the lower bound on speed is (499995/1000000)(7200/121)= 3599964/12100000 km/hr. Those, of course, can be reduced.
 
The actual question is:

img026.jpg
 
you've made a mistake :bugeye:

Code:
You don't need to get an exact value do you? 
"The upper bound of speed = upper bound of distance/lower bound of time"
so .400005 km/.016528 hr= 24.20 km/hr
"The lower bound of speed = lower bound of distance/upper bound of time"
so .499995 km/0.0168055 hr = 29.75 km/hr.

isn't it .399995 = 23.801km/h

and isn't the upper bound

.400005 / 0.016805555 = 23.802km/h

both answers are to 5.s.f
 
Yes, of course! Thank you.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top