Finding values of x where the infinite geometric series converge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the values of x for which the infinite geometric series (2+x) + (2+x)^2 + (2+x)^3 converges. The key condition for convergence is that the absolute value of the common ratio, (2+x), must be less than 1, leading to the inequality -1 < 2 + x < 1. This simplifies to the range -3 < x < -1 for convergence. A participant initially misreads the inequality but later confirms the correct range. The final consensus affirms that the values of x where the series converges are indeed -3 < x < -1.
meeklobraca
Messages
188
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(2+x)+(2+x)^2+(2+x)^3 + ...


Homework Equations







The Attempt at a Solution



Ive found that the l r l < 1

the r of this equation is (2 + x)

so we have -1 < 2 + x < 1

The values of x where the series coverges is -3 < x < -1

Is this correct?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm …

meeklobraca said:
(2+x)+(2+x)^2+(2+x)^3 + ...

Ive found that the l r l < 1

the r of this equation is (2 + x)

so we have -1 < 2 + x < 1

The values of x where the series coverges is -3 < x < -1

Is this correct?

Thanks!

:smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:

Hint: does it converge for x = 0? :wink:
 
meeklobraca said:

Homework Statement


(2+x)+(2+x)^2+(2+x)^3 + ...


Homework Equations







The Attempt at a Solution



Ive found that the l r l < 1

the r of this equation is (2 + x)

so we have -1 < 2 + x < 1

The values of x where the series coverges is -3 < x < -1

Is this correct?

Thanks!

Looks good to me:approve:
 


tiny-tim said:
:smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:

Hint: does it converge for x = 0? :wink:



No I don't think so?

Does your laughing faces mean I got it right? lol
 
i need glasses

meeklobraca said:
No I don't think so?

Does your laughing faces mean I got it right? lol

oh dear … I read a -1 as a 1. :redface:

Yes … sorry, meeklobraca … you got it right! :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top