Finding Van der Waals Distances for C-C Spatial Interactions

AI Thread Summary
Van der Waals distances for carbon-carbon (C-C) spatial interactions typically range from 30 to 50 nm, with interaction strengths around tens of meV per atom. For estimating total energy contributions from these interactions, using a Lennard-Jones potential is recommended for more accurate calculations. A rough approximation can be made by considering half the bond length of the relevant species. Further details about the specific interactions in question would help refine the advice. Accurate modeling is essential for understanding the energy contributions of C-C interactions.
greisen
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am looking for table or something that gives a tumb of rule for van der Waals distances - I have some C C spatial interactions which I would like to determine if their interaction contributes to the total energy or should I calculate it with a Lennard-Jones potential to get an estimation?

Any advise appreciated.
Best Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would assume that one half of the bond length of the species of interest would be a close approximation.
 
greisen said:
Hi,

I am looking for table or something that gives a tumb of rule for van der Waals distances - I have some C C spatial interactions which I would like to determine if their interaction contributes to the total energy or should I calculate it with a Lennard-Jones potential to get an estimation?

Any advise appreciated.
Best Regards
Can you give us a fuller description of the problem? C~C interactions have typical vdW strengths (10s of meV/atom) at separations of 30 to 50 nm.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top