Finding which direct sum of cyclic groups Z*n is isomorphic to

dumbQuestion
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
I always see problems like "how many structurally distinct abelian groups of order (some large number) are there? I understand how we apply the theorem which tells us that every finite abelian group of order n is isomorphic to the direct sum of cyclic groups. We find this by looking at the prime factorization of n, etc. (like for 600, 600 = 2^3 * 3 * 5^2, so we know there are 6 combinations possible and so 6 structurally distinct abelian groups of order 600)

however, what if I'm going the other way around? What if I have a group of order say something simple like 4, takes Z*(8) for example. I want to put this in terms of a direct sum of cyclic groups, and I know there are 4 options. How do I find out which one it is isomorphic to? I know I can do brute force things like take the cyclic subgroups generated by each of the elements and see what the order of each element is. But is there any hard and fast way which will tell me, like maybe based on the prime factorization of n, so that when I'm dealing with a large number (like Z*(700)) I'd be able to tell which direct sum of cyclic groups its isomorphic to?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I will note, I am fairly certain that if I know the generating set of a group, then I can find an answer to this question. For example, Z*(8) is not cyclic, but I know its generating set is (3)(5). From this I can figure out that Z*(8) is isomorphic to C_2 * C_2. But how do I do this for arbitrarily large values of n? How do I find the generating set? Does it have to do with the cosets of a certain cyclic group?
 
I found a paper which addresses my questions of how to find the group which is the isomorphic direct sum and wanted to share it for future reference

http://designtheory.org/library/encyc/topics/abelian.pdfThe only thing I can't figure out still is how to find the group presentation, or the generating set. My guess is that if you know which direct sum of cyclic groups its isomorphic to, then if we enumerate all the cyclic subgroups of Z*n, we can select then based on which elements have the right orders.
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top