Finding Work Done by Friction on a Sliding Block Against a Wedge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by friction on a block sliding down a fixed wedge, modeled as a quarter circle with a radius of 200 cm. The block, with a mass of 2g, slides down from a height of 105 cm, with a coefficient of kinetic friction (μk) of 0.5. Participants explore using conservation of energy principles and differential equations to express the work done by friction and gravity, ultimately leading to a differential equation that describes the motion of the block. The conversation highlights the complexity of integrating the work done by friction and gravity along the wedge's arc.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles in physics
  • Familiarity with differential equations and their applications
  • Knowledge of frictional forces and their calculations
  • Basic concepts of rotational motion and angular velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the work-energy theorem in the context of rotational motion
  • Learn about solving first-order linear differential equations
  • Explore the relationship between angular velocity and linear displacement in circular motion
  • Investigate the effects of varying coefficients of friction on motion dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of motion involving friction and rotational systems will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
Satvik Pandey said:
As ω2 = y
2/dω =dy/dω
2ω = dy/dω
dω = dy/2ω
Putting this value on ωr\frac{dω}{dθ}
I got r\frac{dy}{2dθ}.

Yes, it is correct, and remember it. You will find this relation useful for a great many cases.

ehild
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
ehild said:
I looks OK, (but substitute μ=0.5 in front of the sin term, too) but you can choose the other method for the solution of a linear differential equation. The solution is equal to Y=Yh+ Yp where Yh is the general solution of the homogeneous part 0.5ry'+μry=0 and Yp is a particular solution of the original equation. In case the right hand side is a sum of sins and cosines, you can try a particular solution also as a linear combination of sins and cosines. It is a bit more elementary than the other method, involving integrals.

ehild

ye^{θ}=\int e^{θ}.\frac{gcosθ-μgsinθ}{0.5r} + C

\frac{g}{0.5r}\int e^{θ}cosθdθ-0.5\int e^{θ}sinθdθ

Through integration by parts I found

\int e^{θ}cosθdθ=eθ(sinθ +cosθ)/2

and \int e^{θ}sinθdθ=eθ(sinθ -cosθ)/2Putting this value I got

=\frac{ge^{θ}}{2r}(sinθ+3cosθ)+C

ye^{θ}=\frac{ge^{θ}}{2r}(sinθ+3cosθ)+C

Is it right till here?

On putting θ=0 I found C=3g/2.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Satvik Pandey said:
ye^{θ}=\frac{ge^{θ}}{2r}(sinθ+3cosθ)+C

Is it right till here?

Yes, I think so. Good.

On putting θ=0 I found C=3g/2.

Check the sign of C.
 
  • #34
Satvik Pandey said:
ye^{θ}=\frac{ge^{θ}}{2r}(sinθ+3cosθ)+C

Is it right till here?

On putting θ=0 I found C=3g/2.

Almost. You need y, so the soultion of the differential equation is y=\frac{g}{2r}(sinθ+3cosθ)+Ce^{-θ}
With the initial condition y(0)=0, ##C=\frac{-3g}{2r}##

You did not try my method :cry:

ehild
 
  • #35
ehild said:
Almost. You need y, so the soultion of the differential equation is y=\frac{g}{2r}(sinθ+3cosθ)+Ce^{-θ}
With the initial condition y(0)=0, ##C=\frac{-3g}{2r}##ehild

At initial point y(ω2) and θ are equal to zero.So C=-3g/2

ehild said:
You did not try my method :cry:

ehild
Sorry.:redface:

ehild and TSny, could you please tell me what to do next?
 
  • #36
TSny said:
Yes, I think so. Good..
Thank you.

TSny said:
Check the sign of C.

I got that.It should be -3g/2.
Please tell me what to do next?
 
  • #37
Yes, -3g/2.

Think about what you are trying to find and how that is related to y.
 
  • #38
Satvik Pandey said:
Thank you.
I got that.It should be -3g/2.
Please tell me what to do next?

The C is not correct yet.

ehild
 
  • #39
ehild said:
The C is no correct yet.

ehild

Oops. Yes, there's still something missing in the expression for C. Thanks.
 
  • #40
I think it should be -3g/2r.
 
  • #41
It is all right now. Now remember what y is, and what you need to the solution of the original problem (read it again).

ehild
 
  • #42
I need to find the velocity of block when it makes 90° with horizontal.

So ω2=\frac{9.8}{4}-\frac{29.4}{4}e^{-\pi/2}

What is the value of e^{-\pi/2}.
Sorry but I don't know its value.

Is e^{-\pi/2} equal to 0.021 ?
 
Last edited:
  • #43
You have got a calculator, don't you? And there is pi on it, and you can calculate the value of an exponential function. Maybe, with inverse ln (shift ln).

And your formula is wrong, r is missing and why is 4 in the denominator of the second term?

ehild
 
  • #44
ehild said:
You have got a calculator, don't you? And there is pi on it, and you can calculate the value of an exponential function. Maybe, with inverse ln (shift ln).

And your formula is wrong, r is missing and why is 4 in the denominator of the second term?

ehild

I substituted r=2.It was given in the question.

Is epi/2=11.5703463164?
 
  • #45
Satvik Pandey said:
I substituted r=2.It was given in the question.

Is epi/2=11.5703463164?

In the question, r was given as 200 cm.

You need e-pi/2.
 
  • #46
ω2=\frac{9.8}{4}-\frac{29.4}{4}e^{-\pi/2}

I found e^{-\pi/2}=0.0216

On putting values I found I found ω=1.5136

As V=rω

So V=3.02136

S=1.05m

t=\sqrt{\frac{2S}{g}}=0.429

Velocity of block makes 90° with horizontal at the he point at which it leaves the wedge.
So vertical component of V is 0.
So x=Vt=1.40m=140cm.
 
  • #47
ehild said:
In the question, r was given as 200 cm.

You need e-pi/2.

I changed its unit into meter as the value of 'g' that I have used is 9.8\frac{m}{s<sup>2</sup>}
So 200cm=2m
 
  • #48
Satvik Pandey said:
ω2=\frac{9.8}{4}-\frac{29.4}{4}e^{-\pi/2}

I found e^{-\pi/2}=0.0216

On putting values I found I found ω=1.5136

As V=rω

So V=3.02136

S=1.05m

t=\sqrt{\frac{2S}{g}}=0.429

Velocity of block makes 90° with horizontal at the he point at which it leaves the wedge.
So vertical component of V is 0.
So x=Vt=1.40m=140cm.

It is correct in principle, but the numerical values are not. e^{-\pi/2}=0.20788
How did you get 0.0216? You forgot the parentheses and calculated ##e^{-\pi}/2##?

Also, t=0.4629 s instead of 0.429,
and v makes 0° angle with the horizontal, instead of 90° but these are typos.
And you were right about r=2 m, somehow I thought of 200 mm instead of 200 cm.

The problem was far above high-school level, you needed knowledge about differential equations.
You solved it at the end, congratulation, but it would be more useful for you to practice on problems which are more elementary.

ehild
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #49
ω2=\frac{9.8}{4}-\frac{29.4}{4}e^{-\pi/2}

ω=0.96025
As v=rω
So v=1.920

Since t=0.4629
So x=1.920*0.4629
=0.889 m
And this is approximately equal to 89 cm.

Got correct answer :smile:
 
  • #50
ehild said:
It is correct in principle, but the numerical values are not. e^{-\pi/2}=0.20788
How did you get 0.0216? You forgot the parentheses and calculated ##e^{-\pi}/2##?
ehild

Yes I forgot the parentheses.Sorry for inconvenience.

ehild said:
Also, t=0.4629 s instead of 0.429,
and v makes 0° angle with the horizontal, instead of 90° but these are typos.

ehild
Oh! my typing mistakes. When would they end.:cry:

ehild said:
The problem was far above high-school level, you needed knowledge about differential equations.
You solved it at the end, congratulation, but it would be more useful for you to practice on problems which are more elementary.

ehild

How did you find that I am in high-school?.Is this a prediction?
I have solved similar types of question but in those questions friction was not involved.
When I saw this question I developed curiosity.
Yes,this question needed knowledge about differential equations.
And I do not have much knowledge about it.But I have some knowledge about basic integration and differentiation. I found the method to solve linear differential equation in a secondary school mathematics book.I just applied that method and I got correct answer.:smile:

ehild said:
it would be more useful for you to practice on problems which are more elementary
I will follow your suggestion.

Thank you ehild for helping me.I couldn't have solved this without your help.
 
  • #51
Thank you ehild,TSny,mfb,CAF123 for helping me to find the solution.
 
  • #52
Satvik Pandey said:
How did you find that I am in high-school?.

I saw your Profile :smile:

You become a real scientist if you understand what you do. Maths and Physics are not mere collections of recipes. You have to start from the bases and build up your knowledge step by step. Every step must follow logically from your previous knowledge, and then you would feel a new theorem or proof easy as if you could have discovered them by yourself.

ehild
 
  • #53
ehild said:
I saw your Profile :smile:

You become a real scientist if you understand what you do. Maths and Physics are not mere collections of recipes. You have to start from the bases and build up your knowledge step by step. Every step must follow logically from your previous knowledge, and then you would feel a new theorem or proof easy as if you could have discovered them by yourself.

ehild


Thank you ehild I will follow your suggestion.:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
11K
Replies
16
Views
2K