Maximizing Friction Coefficient for Block on a Wedge: A Calculus Approach

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
Silicon-Based
Messages
51
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A block of mass [itex]m[/itex] is placed on a rough wedge inclined at an angle [itex]α[/itex] to the horizontal, a distance [itex]d[/itex] up the slope from the bottom of the wedge. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and wedge is given by [itex]µ_0x/d[/itex], where [itex]x[/itex] is the distance down the slope from the starting point. Calculate the maximum value of [itex]µ_0[/itex] which will allow the block to reach the bottom of the wedge.

2. The attempt at a solution
After drawing a diagram and resolving the forces I found the acceleration of the block in terms of [itex]x[/itex]:
$$a(x)=g(\sin(\theta)-x\frac{µ_0}{d}\cos(\theta))$$
I don't know how to proceed further, given that the acceleration is defined over [itex]x[/itex] rather than [itex]t[/itex], which prevents me from simply integrating this expression. I suspect the chain rule could be useful ([itex]a=\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}[/itex]), but here again, I don't know how [itex]x[/itex] depends on [itex]t[/itex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silicon-Based said:

Homework Statement


A block of mass [itex]m[/itex] is placed on a rough wedge inclined at an angle [itex]α[/itex] to the horizontal, a distance [itex]d[/itex] up the slope from the bottom of the wedge. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and wedge is given by [itex]µ_0x/d[/itex], where [itex]x[/itex] is the distance down the slope from the starting point. Calculate the maximum value of [itex]µ_0[/itex] which will allow the block to reach the bottom of the wedge.

2. The attempt at a solution
After drawing a diagram and resolving the forces I found the acceleration of the block in terms of [itex]x[/itex]:
$$a(x)=g(\sin(\theta)-x\frac{µ_0}{d}\cos(\theta))$$
I don't know how to proceed further, given that the acceleration is defined over [itex]x[/itex] rather than [itex]t[/itex], which prevents me from simply integrating this expression. I suspect the chain rule could be useful ([itex]a=\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}[/itex]), but here again, I don't know how [itex]x[/itex] depends on [itex]t[/itex].
If you rewrite the equation as ##\ddot x+Bx+C=0##, does it remind you of anything?
Alternatively, use that chain rule, but remember that dx/dt is v.
 
Update:

If I were to integrate the acceleration with respect to time I would get:
$$v(x,t)=g(\sin(\theta)-x\frac{\mu_0}{d}\cos(\theta))t$$ Knowing that the maximum occurs when [itex]v(x=d)=0[/itex], this equation gives [itex]\mu_0=\tan(\theta)[/itex].

Alternatively, the chain rule gives [itex]a=\frac{dv}{dx}v[/itex], so $$\int a dx=\int v dv$$ Again, applying the above condition, I end up with [itex]\mu_0=2g\tan(\theta)[/itex]. Which one is correct?
 
Silicon-Based said:
Update:

If I were to integrate the acceleration with respect to time I would get:
$$v(x,t)=g(\sin(\theta)-x\frac{\mu_0}{d}\cos(\theta))t$$ Knowing that the maximum occurs when [itex]v(x=d)=0[/itex], this equation gives [itex]\mu_0=\tan(\theta)[/itex].

Alternatively, the chain rule gives [itex]a=\frac{dv}{dx}v[/itex], so $$\int a dx=\int v dv$$ Again, applying the above condition, I end up with [itex]\mu_0=2g\tan(\theta)[/itex]. Which one is correct?
Neither.
The first is wrong because you cannot integrate x wrt t merely by multiplying it by t. x depends on t.
The second cannot be right because it is dimensionally wrong. You have a dimensionless number on the left and an acceleration on the right. But the method looks ok, so please post your working.