Finding Zeros of f(x)=x3-3x2-6x+8

  • Thread starter Thread starter math4life
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the zeros of the polynomial function f(x) = x^3 - 3x^2 - 6x + 8. The rational root theorem suggests testing potential rational roots, specifically factors of 8. Synthetic division is used to identify factors, revealing that (x - 4) and (x + 2) are factors, leading to a simpler quadratic. Participants discuss the efficiency of testing smaller numbers first and utilizing the Rule of Signs to determine the number of positive and negative roots. Overall, the conversation emphasizes using synthetic division and strategic testing to find the zeros effectively.
math4life
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


f(x)=x3-3x2-6x+8


Homework Equations


p/q=+-(1,2,4,8)
f(0)=8



The Attempt at a Solution


What is the fastest way to find the zeros? I have to graph it. The back of the book shows the zeros looking to be 4, -2, and most likely 1.5. I am assuming we use the rational zeros theorum to divide by factors of 8 in a trial and error fashion. After I divided by 4 synthetically I got 1,1,-2,0 which I then divided by -2 to get 1, -1, 0. What does this mean? Is there a more efficient way to do this than randomly try all the p/qs?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f(1)=0, so you know x-1 is a factor. Either use synthetic division or regular old polynomial long division to get a quadratic. It should be pretty simple after that.
 
math4life said:
After I divided by 4 synthetically I got 1,1,-2,0 which I then divided by -2 to get 1, -1, 0. What does this mean?

It means that:
  • (x-4) and (1·x2 + 1·x - 2) are factors (using the 1,1,-2 as the coefficients, with 0 as the remainder.
  • (x+2) and (1·x - 1) are factors

Is there a more efficient way to do this than randomly try all the p/qs?
Well, you could combine that with the Rule of Signs to figure out something about the number of positive and negative roots. Also, it's probably easier to start with the smaller numbers (±1, ±2) since it's a little easier to check whether f(x)=0 for those, especially for x=±1. If you can find just one factor, the expression becomes a quadratic which is easier to solve.
 
Got it, thanks.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top