Solve Finite Potential Well: Schrödinger Eqn. & k=qtan(q*a)

feynwomann
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
wjzf9cM.png


'
I've got these solutions to the Schrödinger equation (##-\frac{\hbar} {2m} \frac {d^2} {dx^2} \psi(x) + V(x)*\psi(x)=E*\psi(x)##):
x < -a: ##\psi(x)=C_1*e^(k*x)##
-a < x < a: ##\psi(x)=A*cos(q*x)+B*sin(q*x)##
x > a: ##\psi(x)=C_2*e^(-k*x)##

##q^2=\frac {2m(E+V_0)} {\hbar^2}## and ##k^2=\frac {2mE} {\hbar^2}##

In a previous exercise i showed that in order for the wavefunction to be continuous the following has to be true:
For x = -a: ##C_1*e^-(k*a)=A*cos(q*a)-B*sin(q*a)##
For x = a: ##C_2*e^-(k*a)=A*cos(q*a)+B*sin(q*a)##
and for the derived wavefunctions:
x = -a: ##k*C_1*e^-(k*a)=q*(A*sin(q*a)+B*cos(q*a))##
x = a: ##-k*C_2*e^-(k*a)=-q*(A*sin(q*a)-B*cos(q*a))##

I also know that A*B=0. So here's the question:

I'm asked to show that when A = 0, the four equations above kan be reduced to ##k=q*tan(q*a). But I'm not even sure where to start.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
feynwomann said:
wjzf9cM.png


'
I've got these solutions to the Schrödinger equation (##-\frac{\hbar} {2m} \frac {d^2} {dx^2} \psi(x) + V(x)*\psi(x)=E*\psi(x)##):
x < -a: ##\psi(x)=C_1*e^(k*x)##
-a < x < a: ##\psi(x)=A*cos(q*x)+B*sin(q*x)##
x > a: ##\psi(x)=C_2*e^(-k*x)##

##q^2=\frac {2m(E+V_0)} {\hbar^2}## and ##k^2=\frac {2mE} {\hbar^2}##

In a previous exercise i showed that in order for the wavefunction to be continuous the following has to be true:
For x = -a: ##C_1*e^-(k*a)=A*cos(q*a)-B*sin(q*a)##
For x = a: ##C_2*e^-(k*a)=A*cos(q*a)+B*sin(q*a)##
and for the derived wavefunctions:
x = -a: ##k*C_1*e^-(k*a)=q*(A*sin(q*a)+B*cos(q*a))##
x = a: ##-k*C_2*e^-(k*a)=-q*(A*sin(q*a)-B*cos(q*a))##

I also know that A*B=0. So here's the question:

I'm asked to show that when A = 0, the four equations above kan be reduced to ##k=q*tan(q*a). But I'm not even sure where to start.

Sure, you do. When A=0, your equations become:
  1. ##C_1 e^{-ka}= -B sin(qa)##
  2. ##C_2 e^{-ka}=-B sin(qa)##
  3. ##k C_1 e^{-ka}=q Bcos(qa))##
  4. ##-kC_2*e^{-ka}=q Bcos(qa))##
Using equation 1, you know C_1e^{-ka} = -Bsin(qa)
So replace C_1 e^{-ka} by -B sin(qa) in equation 3.

It doesn't look like it results in the same formula as you are expecting, so maybe there was a mistake somewhere.
 
  • Like
Likes feynwomann
Oh it totally makes sense now. I forgot that my teacher said there was a mistake in the exercise. It's supposed to be B = 0. I didn't think of dividing the equations (I had actually done the first step, but didn't see how I could take it further). Anyway, thanks for the help!
 
Last edited:
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top