Classical What was your first physics book and why did you choose it?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on individuals sharing their first encounters with physics and the textbooks that shaped their understanding. One participant recalls starting with "Conceptual Physics: The High School Physics Program" by Paul G. Hewitt in high school, followed by Giancoli's "Physics: Principles with Applications" during IB physics, and now using the 4th edition of Giancoli for a calculus-based course at UC Santa Cruz. They express dissatisfaction with the recommended "University Physics" textbook, noting it lacks clarity in handling complex concepts while over-explaining simpler ones. Another participant mentions a friend's experience with the same textbook, highlighting its depth in derivations but questioning its overall effectiveness. The conversation reflects a common theme of varying preferences and experiences with physics textbooks in educational settings.
RaulTheUCSCSlug
Gold Member
Messages
179
Reaction score
28
I was just curious on what was everyone's first Physics book, or what was their first encounter with Physics?

My first academic physics book that was not calculus based was my junior year of high school and was Conceptual Physics: The High School Physics Program by Paul G. Hewitt, and then later when I took IB physics used the IB Physics book, but used Giancoli's Physics: Principles with Applications 3rd edition, and now at University of California Santa Cruz I'm using Giancoli's 4th edition book for my first calculus based physics course.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They didn't give us a physics textbook in high school, at least not that I remember. The one my university recommends in University Physics, but I'm personally not a fan of that one.
 
fezster said:
They didn't give us a physics textbook in high school, at least not that I remember. The one my university recommends in University Physics, but I'm personally not a fan of that one.

Oh yes, one of my friends used that book (he was an international student from India) in high school, and I think it was pretty in depth with the derivations that it went through. Was there a particular reason why you were not a fan of the book?
 
RaulTheUCSCSlug said:
Oh yes, one of my friends used that book (he was an international student from India) in high school, and I think it was pretty in depth with the derivations that it went through. Was there a particular reason why you were not a fan of the book?
Personally, I found that it went too in-depth with concepts that were easy to understand, and then went over the more difficult concepts pretty quickly.
 
Im currently reading mathematics for physicists by Philippe Dennery and André Krzywicki, and I’m understanding most concepts however I think it would be better for me to get a book on complex analysis or calculus to better understand it so I’m not left looking at an equation for an hour trying to figure out what it means. So here comes the split, do I get a complex analysis book? Or a calculus book? I might be able to Borrow a calculus textbook from my math teacher study that for a bit and...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K