Calculus First order differential equations ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on recommended textbooks for learning first-order differential equations. Key suggestions include Shepley L. Ross's "Differential Equations," which is favored for its clarity, although some find the operator method section challenging. The Dover title by Maurris Terrabaun is also mentioned positively. Zill and Boyce/Prima are recognized as standard university texts, effective but generic, with Zill noted for providing more detailed explanations on topics like the Laplace Transform. Simmons's "Differential Equations with Applications and Historical Notes" is appreciated for its engaging content and problem-solving focus, though some users feel it lacks depth in certain areas. Overall, a combination of Ross supplemented with either Zill or Boyce/Prima is recommended for a comprehensive understanding.
awholenumber
Messages
200
Reaction score
10
what is a good book to learn first order differential equations ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Other people, including myself, have recommended you titles. Please search your previous post.
 
Ross: Differential Equations
Maurris Terrabaun (Not sure how this is spelled): It is a dover title.
Zill or Boyce/Prima: These are the standard textbooks used at universities. Generic, but get the job done.

I would purchase Ross and supplement it with either Boyce/Prima or Zill.

The Terrabaun book is also nice, but for some reason I prefer Ross.

My only complaint with Ross, is that the operator method section can be hard to read for some people. A few of my friends found that section to be incoherent. I found it readable. Laplace Transform is explained well, but Zill gives a bit more explanation. That is the only thing I liked about ZIll.

Zill/Boyce have harder plug and chug problems.

The book by Simmons: Differential Equations with Applications and Historical Notes, is also nice. I found it to concise for my needs. Lots of thinking problems. It is an interesting read, like all of Simmons books. Found the coverage lacking.
 
MidgetDwarf ,

Shepley L. Ross - Differential Equations ,looks like a really nice book ...thanks a lot for all the book suggestions ...
 
MidgetDwarf said:
Ross: Differential Equations
Maurris Terrabaun (Not sure how this is spelled): It is a dover title.
Zill or Boyce/Prima: These are the standard textbooks used at universities. Generic, but get the job done.

I would purchase Ross and supplement it with either Boyce/Prima or Zill.

The Terrabaun book is also nice, but for some reason I prefer Ross.

My only complaint with Ross, is that the operator method section can be hard to read for some people. A few of my friends found that section to be incoherent. I found it readable. Laplace Transform is explained well, but Zill gives a bit more explanation. That is the only thing I liked about ZIll.

Zill/Boyce have harder plug and chug problems.

The book by Simmons: Differential Equations with Applications and Historical Notes, is also nice. I found it to concise for my needs. Lots of thinking problems. It is an interesting read, like all of Simmons books. Found the coverage lacking.
MidgetDwarf, what are the topics that you found lacking in the book by Simmons?
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
932
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Back
Top