- #1
charlie.elvers
- 2
- 0
I think I mostly understand how this works, and it makes intuitive sense. However, I'm a little bit confused by one step in the proving of this.
On the second page of the attached PDF, there is this statement:
x' + kx = (r/k + c2)δ(t) ... (followed by the cases of t<0 and t>0
What comes after δ(t) is easy for me to follow, but I don't know where this δ(t) term comes from. Does this term evaluate to 0? If so, how? I would think it'd evaluate to (r/k + c2) because the (r/k + c2) is independent of t
Thanks.
On the second page of the attached PDF, there is this statement:
x' + kx = (r/k + c2)δ(t) ... (followed by the cases of t<0 and t>0
What comes after δ(t) is easy for me to follow, but I don't know where this δ(t) term comes from. Does this term evaluate to 0? If so, how? I would think it'd evaluate to (r/k + c2) because the (r/k + c2) is independent of t
Thanks.