First principles/induction proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter forty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the formula for the sum of the first n natural numbers, 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n = n(n+1)/2, using first principles and induction. The original poster expresses confusion about how to start the proof and seeks guidance. Participants suggest considering the sum in reverse order and adding the two representations to derive insights. They emphasize the need for an inductive approach, starting with a base case and then proving the formula for n+1 based on the assumption for n. The conversation highlights the importance of both methods in understanding the proof's foundation.
forty
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n = n(n+1)/2

I need to prove this by first principles and by induction.

I am extraordinarily stuck with this and don't really know where to begin, I've tried writing the LHS in terms of n then trying to simplify but am pretty much stuck. Any suggestions of how to begin for either method would be very much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is an arithmetic progression with d=1. To start off, imagine the sum:
n + n-1 + n-2 + ... + 1 , which is the same as the above, but written in the reverse order. What happens if you add one sum to the other?
 
Sorry for my lack of understanding but what do you mean by this..

What happens if you add one sum to the other?

do you mean what happens when you add n + (n-1) + (n-2) and so on? Because if that's what you mean i have no idea >.<
 
He means what happens when you sum

1 + 2 + 3 + ... n-2 + n-1 + n
n + n-1 + n-2 + ... + 3 + 2 + 1
 
scast said:
He means what happens when you sum

1 + 2 + 3 + ... n-2 + n-1 + n
n + n-1 + n-2 + ... + 3 + 2 + 1

This is all fine, but the OP needs an inductive proof. Begin by showing the formula is true for say n=1. Let's call P(n)=n(n+1)/2. Now assume 1+...+n=P(n). You want to prove 1+...+(n+1)=P(n+1). Take the difference of the two equations. (n+1)=P(n+1)-P(n). Can you prove that? That's the inductive step.
 
No, the OP said he needed and proof "from first principles" and an inductive proof. forty and scast were trying to lead him to the first.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top