Fish has gone missing in a tank

  • Thread starter Thread starter Les talons
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tank
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 4K views
Les talons
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At the aquarium where you work, a fish has gone missing in a 8.00mdeep, 8.80m diameter cylindrical tank. You shine a flashlight in from the top edge of the tank, hoping to see if the missing fish is on the bottom. What’s the smallest angle your flashlight beam can make with the horizontal if it’s to illuminate the bottom?

Homework Equations


n1sinΘ1 = n2sinΘ2
index of refraction of water: nw = 1.333
index of refraction of air: na = 1.000293

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought that the minimum angle would be when the beam hit the edge of the tank and formed a right triangle so the angle in the water would be:
Θ2 = arctan(8/8.8)
n2 = nw = 1.333
n1 = na = 1.000293
Θ1 = arcsin[(1.333/1.000293)sin(arctan(8/8.8)] = 63.69°
So then
1.333sin(42.27°) = 1.000293sin(63.69°)
But this is wrong. I also tried to subtract it from 90° but that is wrong as well, to measure from the vertical instead. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Les talons said:
1. (snip) 8.00mdeep, 8.80m diameter cylindrical tank.(snip)

Θ2 = arctan(8/8.8)
(snip).

Sketch it out, and think over the trig definitions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Les talons
Okay, I am confused what is meant by illuminate the bottom. We model the wave fronts of the light source as a ray, so to illuminate the bottom, will this ray have to reach the center of the bottom of the tank, or just an edge of the bottom of the tank where it meets the wall?
 
Hmm, Θ2 in Snell's Law is the angle of refraction of the light ray measured with respect to the normal to the surface of the refracting medium, or "to the vertical." Ah, so I swapped the sides of the right triangle (which is what you had hinted at in outlining), and I was getting the cotangent of the angle Θ2. Θ2 = tangent (opp./adj.) = tan(diameter/height) = tan(8.8/8). So then I can apply Snell's Law to get:
1.333sin(arctan(8.8/8)) = 1.000293sinΘ1
So if Snell's Law can be used to find Θ1, the angle of incidence of the incident light ray with respect to the normal to the surface, I can take the complement of the angle to get the angle measured with respect to the horizontal, right?
I can also use this identity that I came across:
sin(arctan(x)) = x/√(1 +x^2)
 
:p I will be finding Dory now... Thanks a bunch for the posts! I need to be more careful with what the formulas mean in words, so then I will be less likely to apply them blindly and incorrectly.