Fitting Metal Carbonyls into a 30-Ångstrom Pore: Is It Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TPie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metal
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the sizes of iron pentacarbonyl, methylcyclopentadienyl-manganese-tricarbonyl, and dicobalt octacarbonyl in relation to fitting them into a 29-34 angstrom pore. Based on references from a 1977 Inorganic Chemistry paper, estimates suggest that the diameter of these molecules is around 6.5 angstroms, allowing them to fit comfortably within a 30 angstrom pore. The methylcyclopentadienyl group is noted to be approximately 5 angstroms long and flat, further supporting the feasibility of fitting these carbonyls into the specified pore size. Sources for more detailed information include crystal structure databases and quantum-chemical calculations. Overall, the consensus is that these molecules should fit well within the given dimensions.
TPie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What is the size of iron pentacarbonyl, methylcyclopentadienyl-manganese-tricarbonyl, or dicobalt octacarbonyl? Where could I find a source on this information?

I am aiming to fit the above carbonyls into a 29-34 angstrom pore, but I'd like to know if it's even possible given the size of the molecules.

Wikipedia offers numbers based on a paper published in Inorganic Chemistry in 1977. The Co-Co distances is 2.5 angstroms and the Co-CO appears to be in the area of 1.8 angstroms. Does simple math tell me the diameter is no greater than 6.5 angstroms? How does the size of the atoms come into play?

Thank you in advance!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Crystal structure database, experimental data from papers, a quantum-chemical calculation, or even a ball-and-stick model.. Depending on how accurate you want it. (not very it'd seem).

But I can say offhand that all those molecules should easily fit into a 30-Ångstrom pore.

6.5 isn't a bad guess. In fact, I'd wager they'd all fit into boxes of 7x7x7 Å.

Even the bulky methylcyclopentadienyl group is only about 5 Å from end-to-end (and it's flat).
 
30 Angstroms is a big pore... but how big is the door?
 
alxm said:
Crystal structure database, experimental data from papers, a quantum-chemical calculation, or even a ball-and-stick model.. Depending on how accurate you want it. (not very it'd seem).

But I can say offhand that all those molecules should easily fit into a 30-Ångstrom pore.

6.5 isn't a bad guess. In fact, I'd wager they'd all fit into boxes of 7x7x7 Å.

Even the bulky methylcyclopentadienyl group is only about 5 Å from end-to-end (and it's flat).

Great. Thank you for the information.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top