Fixed Target & CoM Energy of colliding protons

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sekonda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Protons
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the energy and momentum of colliding protons in different frames, specifically the lab frame and the center of mass (CoM) frame. The user seeks clarification on the correct use of invariant mass and energy values, questioning whether to use 7TeV or 14TeV for center of mass energy. It is confirmed that 7TeV should be used as the center of mass energy per collision, leading to a lab energy calculation of approximately 2.5 x 10^4 TeV. The importance of including the mc^2 term in the calculations is emphasized, along with the understanding that the invariant mass in the CoM frame does not include momentum terms due to the equal and opposite momenta of the colliding protons. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of relativistic energy-momentum relations in particle physics.
Sekonda
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Hey,

My question is with part (c) of the below:

tmst3.png


I wanted to check that I had done this write as I struggle to determine the correct invariants for each frame... despite their invariance. So for the lab frame I had

\frac{\ E_{lab}^{2}}{c^{2}}-p^{2}=(\frac{E}{c}+m_{p}c)^{2}-p^{2}=2Em_{p}+m_{p}^{2}c^{2}=m^{2}c^{2}

(Where E is the energy of the cosmic ray proton)

Where the last step is done by using the relativistic energy-momentum relation and the very last term is the invariant mass. The Centre of mass frame has:

\frac{E_{CoM}^{2}}{c^{2}}=m^{2}c^{2}

Finally we attain:

2Em_{p}+m_{p}^{2}c^{2}=\frac{E_{CoM}^{2}}{c^{2}}\: ,\: E=\frac{\frac{E_{CoM}^{2}}{c^{2}}-m_{p}^{2}c^{2}}{2m_{p}}

I think this is correct but I used 7TeV for the centre of mass energy, should I use 14TeV? It says the 7TeV is the centre of mass energy per collision, so I'm guessing I use E(CoM)=7TeV and find E(lab) which was about 2.5*10^4 TeV.

Thanks if anyone can tell me if this is correct!
sk
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sekonda said:
\frac{\ E_{lab}^{2}}{c^{2}}-p^{2}=(\frac{E}{c}+m_{p}c)^{2}-p^{2}=2Em_{p}+m_{p}^{2}c^{2}=m^{2}c^{2}

(Where E is the energy of the cosmic ray proton)
Where is the difference between E and E_lab?
What happened to E^2-p^2 at the second "="? It should give an additional mc^2.
Why should this be equal to the total energy in the center of mass frame?
There is no new particle produced, you don't have an invariant mass (apart from the masses of the protons).

I wonder how you used momentum conservation here.

I think this is correct but I used 7TeV for the centre of mass energy, should I use 14TeV? It says the 7TeV is the centre of mass energy per collision, so I'm guessing I use E(CoM)=7TeV and find E(lab) which was about 2.5*10^4 TeV.
Use 7 TeV as center of mass energy.

E(lab) = 2.5*10^4 TeV has the right order of magnitude.
 
Thanks

Yeah I forgot the mc^2 term - there should be one in that second =, thanks! I thought the invariant for the lab frame has to be the same in any frame and for the CoM frame there's no momentum term due to equal and opposite momenta's of the particles. I guess I mean the mass of the protons then instead of invariant mass!

Thanks,
SK
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top