Electrical Fixing a 1965 GM Car Radio AM | Troubleshooting Tips

  • Thread starter Thread starter John1397
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car gm Radio
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on troubleshooting a 1965 GM car radio that has stopped working after intermittent issues for decades. Participants suggest that the problem may stem from oxidized contacts or cracked solder joints, emphasizing the importance of inspecting the circuit board closely. They discuss the expected resistance readings for the radio's components and the potential failure of electrolytic capacitors and carbon resistors. The conversation also highlights the need for a schematic to understand the circuit better and troubleshoot effectively. Overall, the consensus is to methodically check connections and components to identify the fault causing excessive current draw.
  • #31
I finally figured it out washer in wrong spot then every thing is correct still doesn't help my initial problem.I might some time find the problem have more things to check yet.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
John1397 said:
every thing is correct still doesn't help my initial problem.
Which initial problem ?

John1397 said:
The radio would work sometimes if it didn't pushing on the tuning buttons hard or hitting the dash underneath would make it work if it didn't work, this has been that way for 30 years, now it does not come on at all.

or

John1397 said:
With board laying on bench it tests 206 and 215 ohms when reversing leads between ground and the point where 12 volts goes to circuit board.
 
  • #33
One mistake leads to another first didn't install output transistor correctly then drew out diagram thinking c is ground then tested fourth pin in capacitor thinking it is just ground pin (4 capacitors in the can not three) it had 2 meg resistance to ground did not spark after applying voltage and shorting with screw driver.Now I am thinking this capacitor which is the finale capacitor from speaker and transformer output to ground if has no capacitance left might be kind of important.
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
  • #34
I connected 8 ohm speaker where it normally would connect I get .12 base 0 collector .13 emitter of finale output transistor. When I disconnect speaker and reconnect to emitter of final output transistor I get 1.3 emitter 0 collector 1.43 base. If I move speaker connection to base of finale output transistor I get .88 emitter .85 collector .51 base. If you connect speaker to emitter terminal of finale output transistor you get a lot of readings further up front in the 1.3 to 1.5 volt range. If there is a short it could be any where on that board? There are seven electrolytic capacitors I changed four of them because of failure.
 
  • #35
John1397 said:
One mistake leads to another

Your output circuit has to resemble this to make a significant amount of sound.
I just redrew the one from that tutorial and added a capacitor CE in parallel with RE.

65Buickradio2.jpg

With volmteter's black wire on GND
Volts at the collector should be a couple volts or less but not zero
Volts at the emitter should be probably a couple volts less than battery , like ten or so
volts at the base should be close to 1/3 volt less than emitter.
John1397 said:
When I disconnect speaker and reconnect to emitter of final output transistor I get 1.3 emitter 0 collector 1.43 base.
That's because your speaker is only about five or six ohms so it short circuits current around the output transistor.dropping almost all your 12 volts across RE and leaving no current through the inductor.

John1397 said:
If I move speaker connection to base of finale output transistor I get .88 emitter .85 collector .51 base.
That's because grounding the base through your five or six ohm speaker turns the transistor fully on, again dropping almost all your 12 volts across RE

From this sketch of yours, which i think has some errors,
upload_2018-10-4_20-30-0.png


I'm guessing that in the redrawn tutorial sketch above
RE is 47 ohms
and there's an electrolytic capacitor in parallel with it

Get your drawings straightened out, find R1 and R2,

then write down volts a E B and C
 

Attachments

  • 65Buickradio2.jpg
    65Buickradio2.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 615
  • upload_2018-10-4_20-30-0.png
    upload_2018-10-4_20-30-0.png
    28.3 KB · Views: 591
  • #36
John1397 said:
I connected 8 ohm speaker where it normally would connect
Where is that ?
 
  • #37
I was just moving speaker connection around so I drew up three different speaker hookups and voltages around output transistor. 0 volts at collector will never work. I have been thinking I do not know if anybody does this but it seems if unit is drawing to much current start opening up circuit starting at power supply then moving to output transistor and so on to see where those amps are going if power supply heads in two direction you can't till which way short is by measuring volts but with amp meter you could. I am going to change output transistor to a different good one sure transistor tester says it is good but that could be wrong. And transformer is wound that way as two wires coming out of transformer to speaker are soldier together almost way down to the point where they come out of transformer.


214805-9a42bf83966e7a3fa7abb8de52185fa7.jpg
 

Attachments

  • one.png
    one.png
    39.3 KB · Views: 495
  • two.PNG
    two.PNG
    51.3 KB · Views: 482
  • three.PNG
    three.PNG
    43.2 KB · Views: 527
  • minerevised.JPG
    minerevised.JPG
    20.8 KB · Views: 376
Last edited:
  • #38
John1397 said:
I drew up three different speaker hookups and voltages around output transistor.
Okay when troubleshooting you must resolve things that defy logic one by one until the mysteries are all gone.

You say you've heard sound out of this radio so it must be almost working.
Now what doesn't make sense ?
First thing that jumps out at me is..

Curiously
all three of your recent sketches show emitter hooked straight to +12volts by a wire
yet a much lower voltage reading there of between 0.13 and 1.3 volts.
upload_2018-10-5_13-56-55.png
Is your 12 volt supply really collapsing that severely ?
Or is that wire to emitter broken in the middle ?

Not much chance of anything working with supply less than a volt.
Figure that one out first.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-10-5_13-56-55.png
    upload_2018-10-5_13-56-55.png
    34.6 KB · Views: 557
  • #39
Is there something missing from your three sketches ?

upload_2018-10-5_14-7-3.png


does that say ".47 fuse" ?

Where'd you get that drawing ?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-10-5_14-7-3.png
    upload_2018-10-5_14-7-3.png
    20.3 KB · Views: 821
  • #40
jim hardy said:
Is there something missing from your three sketches ?

View attachment 231732

does that say ".47 fuse" ?

Where'd you get that drawing ?
I found this online a genuine delco book that drawing is right . I measured 0.8 ohms across this . On one side of this device on the circuit board it says fuse and the other side it says res. It is kindy 3/35" diameter 3/8" long looks like in metal can has cotton sleeve over the outside. I thought it was a thermal type fuse to protect the output transistor.
I never measured voltage just amp draw of unit was .56 amps I just seen this now on the manual diagram says normal amp draw is 1.3 Amp that is more than likely what is happening the fuse is opening up after you apply power. Know I see why in the three drawings in drawing three where speaker is connected to base the voltages go up, applying load increases resistance then voltage drops. You need 12 volts on emitter. This is probably why the output transistor is still good I have heard using radios and amps without speaker connected can burn out transistor I do not know if this radio is one of those.
 
Last edited:
  • #41
Now you're seeing the approach - understand what voltages to expect then check for them with a meter.
To that end
it is vital to have an accurate schematic drawing
and know physically on the board where are key points to measure.

Can you read voltage on both sides of that fuse ?

That'll work better than an Easter egg hunt for a short that might not even be there.
Unless you're extremely lucky.
 
  • #42
Two diagrams a year apart both circuit a little different problem is burned out predriver to the finale output transistor. In my drawing I have NPN driving the DS-503 and one year earlier they used an PNP to drive the PNP DS-503 output tansistor. They used what appears to be two of the same transistors but no number I think an ECG103 would work or how hard would it be to make a Silicon say ECG158 work?
 

Attachments

  • rad 65.JPG
    rad 65.JPG
    42.8 KB · Views: 563
  • #43
What are ECG103 and 158 ? You've already looked them up so save us a search.
What's in the radio ?

I cannot read the numbers on your drawings. Can you clean them up a little and repost?

2N3903, 2N3904, 2N3905 and 2N3906 will replace 90% of all general purpose small signal transistors.

A good circuit is tolerant of variations in transistor specs.
Just make sure your Vce and Ic ratings are adequate
and hfe is same order of magnitude.
 
  • #44
I seen online some one wrote when changing geranium to silicon double resistor value from base to collector. Mine is 22k so if I change to 44k should work?
 
  • #45
John1397 said:
I seen online some one wrote when changing geranium to silicon double resistor value from base to collector. Mine is 22k so if I change to 44k should work?

sounds like gibberish to me. And since i can't make out numbers on the schematic i don't know what the 22k does.

You SHOULD adjust the two resistors that set base voltage to account for higher Emitter- Base voltage of 0.6 instead of 0.3.

I can't read the values of those two resistors on your drawings.
And i don't believe your hand drawn schematic because it shows two bases tied together and there's noplace for collector current to go..
You haven't yet tried to understand transistor biasing.

Try first just swapping in a silicon. If base is biased for mid-supply it'll most likely work.
If not try decreasing your 22K (base pulldown resistor?) by 10% and see what happens.
Easiest way is by tacking a 220K or 240K in parallel with it.
 
  • #46
The drawing is still right just need to reverse b and c on both preamps . When installing new transistor it was ecb I thought ebc when making drawing so not drawn right. I changed 22k to 44k I see some recommend as much as 1 meg, I do not know if there is a formula to figure that out. I don't know if that exactly right. I made a new drawing where every thing is right and have the correct voltages. I finally decided to inject audio signal at volume control to see if amp part works rather than fixing every thing and it did so I then connect signal from radio and it worked.
 

Attachments

  • f1.JPG
    f1.JPG
    11.3 KB · Views: 499
Last edited:
  • #47
John1397 said:
I finally decided to inject audio signal at volume control to see if amp part works rather than fixing every thing and it did so I then connect signal from radio and it worked.
Can't argue with success, can you ? Must feel great to hear it playing .
Got a '60's radio station in town ? I think "Wooly Bullly" was #1 that year...

old jim
 
  • #48
Found the on off problem anyone fixing these watch for tab punched out of top cover so it doesn't touch circuit board and short out signal. The tab bent down on cover about 1/4" should go on part of circuit board with no foil.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff and Tom.G
  • #49
John1397 said:
Found the on off problem anyone fixing these watch for tab punched out of top cover so it doesn't touch circuit board and short out signal. The tab bent down on cover about 1/4" should go on part of circuit board with no foil.
Got a Picture ?
 
  • #50
215168-528d413d25f12a9ff48e8dc6a21b9adb.jpg
 

Attachments

  • short.JPG
    short.JPG
    56.7 KB · Views: 361
  • 215168-528d413d25f12a9ff48e8dc6a21b9adb.jpg
    215168-528d413d25f12a9ff48e8dc6a21b9adb.jpg
    1.7 KB · Views: 614
  • #51

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
84K