Fixing Error: 10 Particles Got Lost in Fast Reactor Model

AI Thread Summary
The user is encountering an error in their fast reactor model, specifically "run terminated because 10 particles got lost," and is seeking assistance. The model aims to obtain axial flux and power distributions, divided into zones for tallying. It is suggested that lost particles may indicate a geometry error, potentially allowing particles to escape the simulation space. Reviewing the output file can provide details on lost particles, including their last known location and transport vector, which may help identify the issue. Careful examination of the geometry setup is crucial for resolving the problem.
Juan Ar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am trying to run a fast reactor model but I cannot figure out what is happening because I get the error: run terminated because 10 particles got lost. I am using the sdef card (with and without parameters) and the model is not running. Hope you can help me to fix any mistake I did. The goal in this model is to obtain the axial flux distribution as well as the axial power distribution so I divided the model in different zones to use a F7 and a F4 tally in each one of this zone. I attach the file.

Thanks
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
Perhaps by describing it in more detail and questioning how you setup your model you will find your missing particles.

Is it possible that this can happen in a normal simulation without it being wrong?

Could the particles have trajectories that just escape out into space that is outside of your simulation just like real particles in a real reactor?
 
This happens usually only if there is a geometry error. Perhaps the region where there is an error is so small, it might not be visible in the plot. If you carefully go through the output file, MCNP prints out details of every single lost particle, it's last known location, cell and transport vector. That should lead you right to the location of the geometry error.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top