Alan Alda's "Flame Challenge": Explaining Fire to 11 Year Olds

AI Thread Summary
Alan Alda initiated a competition aimed at explaining the concept of fire to eleven-year-olds, inspired by his own childhood curiosity when a simple answer of "it's oxidation" left him unsatisfied. The competition attracted numerous submissions, with the top six finalists selected by a panel of 6,000 eleven-year-olds. The entries varied in creativity, with some incorporating songs and engaging visuals, while others were criticized for underestimating the understanding level of their young audience. The overall goal was to present the concept in an interesting and accessible manner without oversimplifying it. The competition highlights the importance of effective communication in science education for children.
AnTiFreeze3
Messages
246
Reaction score
9
I thought that this was an interesting idea. Basically, Alan Alda started a competition of some sorts for people to explain what fire is to eleven year olds.

The basis for starting this is that, when he was eleven, he was interested in fire, asked his science teacher what it was, and all that she said was, "it's oxidation." Clearly, to an eleven year old, that isn't going to take him very far.

Lots of people submitted to it, and as of now it's down to the top six finalists (they were all judged by a panel of 6,000 eleven year olds...)

Here's the link to the website if you guys want to check it out: http://www.flamechallenge.org/

Some of the videos are interesting to watch, and one guy even implemented a song into the end of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I also just finished watching the Colbert Report. Haven't had a chance to check out the site yet, but I thought that Stephen's explanation was... interesting. :biggrin:
 
The devil's tears are burning strong tonight...
 
AnTiFreeze3 said:
The devil's tears are burning strong tonight...

And just when I got over needing a night-light...
 
My favorite is #794, followed by #765.

I thought the start of #794 was kind of strange, with the guy chained to the wall (they never did explain that part), but it did give the best explanation for an 11-year-old and the song was great!

I think some of the entries underestimated what an 11-year-old could understand.
 
*sings*
Cheeemiiluminescence!
 
What? No mention of Phlogiston? ?

I'm kidding! But really, I try to bring "phlogiston" into the discussion every chance I get, particularly in professional settings.
 
BobG said:
... I think some of the entries underestimated what an 11-year-old could understand.

My thoughts as well. They definitely don't need to make it extremely complex, but I think the biggest part of the competition was making something that 11 year olds would actually find interesting, and wasn't too over their heads. Just dumbing down the concept doesn't help them at all.
 
Back
Top