Flawed Proof: x + y = y in Algebra - Spivak Calculus (1994) Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter jrdunaway
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Spivak
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying flaws in a purported proof that claims \( x + y = y \) under the assumption \( x = y \). The problem is situated within algebra, specifically addressing the implications of dividing by zero in algebraic manipulations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the validity of the steps taken in the proof, particularly questioning the division by \( (x - y) \) when \( x = y \). Some participants suggest that this division leads to an invalid conclusion, while others emphasize the importance of recognizing when division by zero occurs.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the proof's flaws, with participants providing insights into the incorrect steps and discussing alternative approaches to handling the situation without losing potential solutions. Some participants have offered clarifications on the algebraic principles involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of not dividing by zero and the implications of such actions in algebraic proofs. There is also mention of common practices in solving quadratic equations that relate to the current discussion.

jrdunaway
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2. What is wrong with the following "proof"? Let x = y. Then
x2 =xy,
x2 - y2 =xy - y ,
(x + y)(x -y) = y(x - y),
x + y = y,
2y = y,
2= 1.

Homework Equations



It's obvious that x + y =/= y, but I do not know how to "prove" this, i.e. which proof from algebra is applicable here. My hunch is that it is the Distributive Property?

The Attempt at a Solution



I honestly am not sure where to start with this. All I can see is that dividing (x-y) out from step 3 to step 4 is what causes the inequality.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi jrdunaway welcome to pf! :smile:
jrdunaway said:
(x + y)(x -y) = y(x - y),
x + y = y,

All I can see is that dividing (x-y) out from step 3 to step 4 is what causes the inequality.

that's right! :smile:

if x = y, that means that you divided by 0, which isn't allowed

so (if x = y) that step is not valid
 
jrdunaway said:

Homework Statement



2. What is wrong with the following "proof"? Let x = y. Then
x2 =xy,
x2 - y2 =xy - y ,
You mean xy- y2 on the right.

But you still can't divide by 0.

(x + y)(x -y) = y(x - y),
x + y = y,
2y = y,
2= 1.

Homework Equations



It's obvious that x + y =/= y, but I do not know how to "prove" this, i.e. which proof from algebra is applicable here. My hunch is that it is the Distributive Property?

The Attempt at a Solution



I honestly am not sure where to start with this. All I can see is that dividing (x-y) out from step 3 to step 4 is what causes the inequality.
5*0= 0 and 3*0= 0 so 5*0= 3*0. It does not follow that 5= 3!
 
jrdunaway said:
What is wrong with the following "proof"? Let x = y. Then
x2 =xy,
x2 - y2 =xy - y ,
(x + y)(x -y) = y(x - y),
x + y = y,

What instead should have been done was

[tex](x+y)(x-y)=y(x-y)[/tex]

[tex](x+y)(x-y)-y(x-y)=0[/tex]

[tex](x-y)(x+y-y)=0[/tex]
(factorized out (x-y) from both factors)

[tex](x-y)x=0[/tex]

So either x-y=0, thus x=y, or x=0

This is common practice when solving quadratics and such. If you end up with [tex]x^2+x=0[/tex] for example, you don't divide through by x to obtain [itex]x+1=0[/itex] because then you lose the solution of x=0. What you instead do is factorize into the form [itex]x(x+1)=0[/itex] which allows you to find all the solutions.
 
PhysicsForums,

you guys have exceeded my expectations! Thank you! I'll be back soon I'm sure :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K