Flexural strength as length shrinks

  • Thread starter Thread starter princeyprince
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Strength
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the flexural strength of balsa wood planks tested under a three-point load. It highlights that maximum load decreases with length up to a certain point, after which it increases, contradicting the standard flexural strength formula. The formula is deemed unsuitable for non-isotropic materials like wood, which require specific considerations such as moisture content and grain orientation. Additionally, the formula's assumptions about small deflections and beam aspect ratios may not hold true for very short beams, where bending and compression forces interact. Overall, the applicability of the flexural strength formula to the tests conducted is questioned.
princeyprince
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm currently compiling a report on the strength of balsa woods planks under a three point test.

Thus far I've found that maximum load shrinks as length does, upto a point, beyond which max load increases. This doesn't fit with the proscribed flex. strength = 3FL/2bd^2 formula.

Is there any concurrent formula that can make allowance for this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The first major issue I see is that you are trying to use a relation based on isotropic materials on a non-isotropic material. Working with wood requires some special process requirements, most notably is the control of moisture content in the wood and grain orientation.
 
princeyprince said:
I'm currently compiling a report on the strength of balsa woods planks under a three point test.

Thus far I've found that maximum load shrinks as length does, upto a point, beyond which max load increases. This doesn't fit with the proscribed flex. strength = 3FL/2bd^2 formula.

That formula also assumes things like small deflections, and certain aspect ratios of the beam. For very short beams, the forumla cannot apply because the forces in the beam will not be pure bending, but rather a combination of bending and compression.

In short, the formula may not be at all applicable to the tests you are performing.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top