Flow and Pressure: Increasing Air Circulation without a Fan

  • Thread starter Thread starter rlingineni
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a project involving a homemade cooling system using dry ice as a coolant. The user faced challenges with air circulation in the system, initially attempting to use a bicycle pump to pressurize air but resulting in overheating and tube failure. They experimented with adding water to a bottle to increase pressure, drawing inspiration from bottle rocket designs, which led to significant pressure buildup and eventual bursting of the bottle. Participants clarified that the presence of water reduces the volume available for air, allowing for higher pressure with fewer pump strokes. Suggestions included using a sturdy pressure vessel to store air and release it slowly to improve circulation without a fan.
rlingineni
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am an amateur in engineering and new to this forum, so please excuse me if I am posting this in the wrong location. I am doing a little project outside of school that deals with water generation.

The project consists of a coolant that travels through a network of pipes and cools a coil to a desired temperature. For my coolant I am using dry ice(solid Carbon Dioxide), because it directly sublimates from a solid into a gas.I ran into a little problem during the execution of my project. Basically, what happened was, when I placed the dry ice within my containment chamber( which by the way is a homemade flask that consists of a water bottle placed within a 2 liter bottle with the gaps filled in by insulation foam), the rate of sublimation was too slow to spread through the entire network of tubes and cool the coil.

As a result, I need to somehow make make the cool air travel through the tubes. I have also considered the application of a fan, but it seems impractical on a large scale to use a battery and its not really applicable for an experiment that is meant to be low cost. So I explored the idea of adding air via a bicycle pump into the chamber and "pressurizing" it to force the cool air into the tubes and cool the coils. That didn't work(BTW I am also using tire valve stems), in fact, I ended up overheating the bicycle pump, and exploding the tube off.

With that in mind, I tried the same experiment in a more smaller environment, where I tried it with a simple water bottle and I observed that the bottle expands when the air is pumped but then contracts when the cylinder within the pump moves up. Essentially, I was expecting the bottle to work like a pressurized inner tube releasing air at a high force.

As a result, I retried the experiment but with one little change, I filled the bottle half with water and pumped air into it, and pressure began to build to the extent where the bottle would eventually burst. I want to know why this happened(water vs empty bottle) and also can anyone suggest to me how I may circulate air within the tubes without the use of a fan?

*Sorry I wrote a lot, Thank you in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rlingineni said:
observed that the bottle expands when the air is pumped but then contracts when the cylinder within the pump moves up.
It sounds like the bottle let's the air out slower than the pump supplies it, but the pump only supplies air on the downward stroke.

As a result, I retried the experiment but with one little change, I filled the bottle half with water and pumped air into it, and pressure began to build to the extent where the bottle would eventually burst. I want to know why this happened(water vs empty bottle)
I don't understand - how was this different? What were you hoping the water would do?
also can anyone suggest to me how I may circulate air within the tubes without the use of a fan?
You can cool pressurized air ... keep the air in a large sturdy pressure vessel. I have used a 40L drum for this myself. You can pressurize it with a bicycle pump and then release air slowly through a valve when you need it. Or you could just pump your existing setup more slowly.
 
Well, I added water because I read online this is how they make pressure rockets:
http://www.wikihow.com/Make-a-Powerful-Air-Pressure-Rocket

Since they make it like so, I was thinking that if water is what causes the build-up of pressure, perhaps if I add water to a water bottle, then maybe it would result in some pressure build-up.
 
Water is used in bottle-rockets for reaction mass.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_rocket

All it is doing in your case is occupying volume - so the higher pressure builds up in fewer strokes of the pump. Do you understand how pressure forms when you pump air?

I still don't understand what the difference between the two cases was.
 
No, I think that was the difference, "higher pressure builds up in fewer strokes of the pump" with the water in place. Ok, I understand.

Thank You
 
rlingineni said:
No, I think that was the difference, "higher pressure builds up in fewer strokes of the pump" with the water in place
... because the water takes up some of the volume in the chamber. Put the same amount of air into a smaller volume and you get a higher pressure.

(Just making sure.)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top