# Homework Help: Flow rate in unconfined aquifier?

1. Dec 26, 2017

### tzx9633

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

A 40cm well was drilled penetrating straight into unconfined aquifier at depth of 90m . The other wells were drilled at a distance of 20m and 100m from initial well have decrease in water level of 12m and 8m from groundwater level . If the aquifier has a permeability value of 200m / day , what’s the pumping rate of well ?

2. Relevant equations

3. The attempt at a solution
Permeability in m^3 / s = 200/24/3600
H = 90 – 8 = 82
H = 90- 12 = 78

My working is Q = πk( H^2 -h^2) / ln (R /r)= π( (200/24/3600)x (82^2 - 78^2)) / ln(100/200 = 2.89m^3 / s , But the ans provided is 1.06m^3 / s , what's wrong with my answer ? The ans provided is in m^3 /s

#### Attached Files:

• ###### 782.PNG
File size:
46.7 KB
Views:
33
2. Dec 26, 2017

### haruspex

3. Dec 26, 2017

### tzx9633

what do you mean ? Can you explain further ?

4. Dec 26, 2017

### haruspex

If the water level of an aquifer decreases, is it shallower or deeper?

5. Dec 26, 2017

### tzx9633

Shallower , am i right ?

6. Dec 26, 2017

### haruspex

Just realised my question was ambiguous.
I meant shallower in the sense of nearer the ground surface. If the water level falls it will be further from the ground surface, right?

7. Dec 26, 2017

### tzx9633

yes , any part of my working is wrong ? I couldnt get the ans ...

8. Dec 26, 2017

### haruspex

You are not getting my hints.
The first well is at a depth of 90m, i.e. its water's surface is at 90m below ground level.
The next well has a water surface 12m lower, so how far below ground level is that?

9. Dec 26, 2017

### tzx9633

102 m ...

10. Dec 26, 2017

### tzx9633

H = 90+ 8 = 98
H = 90 + 12 = 102

My working is Q = πk( H^2 -h^2) / ln (R /r)= π( (200/24/3600)x (102^2 - 98^2)) / ln(100/200 = 3.61m^3 / s , but the ans provided is 1.06m^3 / s , what's wrong with my answer ? Which is still wrong

11. Dec 26, 2017

### haruspex

Sorry, I should have looked at the diagram sooner. I now see that the wording is misleading. Your original calculation of 82m and 78m was correct. The only error I see in your working is that you have ln(100/200) instead of ln(200/100), but that would have simply flipped the sign.
That said, if I put your numbers through my calculator I get 6.71m3/s.
The equation puzzles me. I do not understand where that π comes from, since it is not getting multiplied by a radius anywhere. The given 40cm does not seem to feature in the equation (is that radius or diameter?), but I can see why it might be irrelevant.

Edit, just noticed you had 200 instead of 20.., just a typo I guess. Now I get your 2.89.

Edit 2: I tried dividing 2.89 by 1.06. It gives a number very close to e. Perhaps a result of fat-fingering a calculator?

Last edited: Dec 26, 2017
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Threads for Flow rate unconfined Date
Heat Transfer and mass flow rate Nov 10, 2017
Air compressor quesion Jul 17, 2017
Fluid Mechanics -- Volume flow rate Jun 15, 2017
Calculating Mass Flow Rate of Steam Jan 10, 2017
Flue gas flow rate Nov 8, 2016