Flow rate is calculated using only the parallel velocity

AI Thread Summary
Flow rate is determined by the parallel component of velocity to the area vector because only this component contributes to the volume output. The mathematical proof involves using the dot product, which effectively isolates the parallel component of the velocity vector. Any perpendicular velocity does not contribute to flow rate, as it does not affect the volume passing through a given area. The volumetric flow rate can be expressed as the dot product of the area vector and the velocity vector, confirming that only the parallel component matters. Thus, understanding the dot product is crucial for validating this relationship in fluid dynamics.
davidbenari
Messages
466
Reaction score
18
So flow rate is calculated using only the parallel velocity to the area vector. Why is this? How can I mathematically prove this? Namely, how do I prove any perpendicular component of the velocity vector is not contributing to any volume output? I know this is the result of the dot product; I want to know why the dot product is valid reasoning for this scenario.

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the entire velocity were perpendicular, what would be the flow rate?
 
Consider the definition of the volumetric flow rate

\dot{V}=\frac{dV}{dt}

say

V=\vec{A} \cdot \vec{x}

substitution yields

\dot{V}=\vec{A}\cdot\frac{d\vec{x}}{dt}=\vec{A}\cdot\vec{v}

where \vec{v}=\frac{d\vec{x}}{dt} and A materially conserved
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top