Exploring the General Form of FLRW Metric

[Fleet]

Hi all,

I have found the "generic" form of the FLRW metric:
ds^2=(cdt)^2-dl^2

And I have found the three-dimension spatial metric for euclidian space (K=0, spherical space K=1 and hyperboloid space (K=-1):

dl^2=a^2(dr^2+r^2d\Omega^2)

dl^2=a^2(\frac{dr^2}{1-r^2})+r^2d\Omega^2)

dl^2=a^2(\frac{dr^2}{1+r^2})+r^2d\Omega^2)

BUT how do I find the "general" form of the FLRW metric, how can I include the curvature parameter K?

Please help, I really need it!

Best regards.

 

[marcus]

What happens if you just stick a K into the formula, with the understanding that it can take on just those 3 values: -1,0,and 1? Don't you get the three cases you want?

dl^2=a^2(\frac{dr^2}{1-Kr^2})+r^2d\Omega^2)

Hi all,

I have found the "generic" form of the FLRW metric:
ds^2=(cdt)^2-dl^2

And I have found the three-dimension spatial metric for euclidian space (K=0, spherical space K=1 and hyperboloid space (K=-1):

dl^2=a^2(dr^2+r^2d\Omega^2)

dl^2=a^2(\frac{dr^2}{1-r^2})+r^2d\Omega^2)

dl^2=a^2(\frac{dr^2}{1+r^2})+r^2d\Omega^2)

BUT how do I find the "general" form of the FLRW metric, how can I include the curvature parameter K?
...

 

[Fleet]

Thank you very much for you answer, I really appreciate it!

Yes, you are right I get the cases I want. But are you questioning to be ironical or are you sure it the correct way? :)

Love this forum, I'm going to contribute

Best regards

 

[cristo]

Yes, you are right I get the cases I want. But are you questioning to be ironical or are you sure it the correct way? :)

It is the correct way. The general form for the line element is the one that marcus gives. Plugging in values for k gives you the three specific line elements.