Fluid Boundary layer in presence of a postive heat gradient

AI Thread Summary
A boundary layer remains dissipative of momentum even under a positive heat gradient, as excess pressure is released through the pipe wall to the surroundings. Reversing the heat gradient introduces an internal pressure gradient from a quasi stagnation pressure to the lower static pressure of the moving fluid. While adding energy to the flow may appear to reduce momentum loss, it does not fundamentally alter the dissipation occurring within the boundary layer. The perceived decrease in dissipation is merely a result of compensating for the energy loss rather than changing the inherent dissipative nature of the boundary layer. Ultimately, the boundary layer's dissipative characteristics persist regardless of the heat gradient applied.
Quentin_C
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I was wondering how a boundary layer would be dissipative of momentum if it was under the influence of a positive heat gradient.

I understand that the reason that we don't see the boundary pressure equal the stagnation pressure is that the boundary is dissipative (so excess pressure above static pressure is "dumped" thru the pipe wall to the surroundings.)

If this heat gradient was reversed I could see that we would have an additional internal pressure gradient from a boundary quasi stagnation pressure to the lower static pressure in the moving fluid.

This gradient could be resolved by adding energy to the flowing fluid.

Should this mean that we would lose less momentum from the flow ?
upload_2016-10-10_14-13-20.png
 
I am not 100% sure what you are asking here, but even in the presence of a heat flux into or out of the boundary layer (e.g. through the wall), the boundary layer is still dissipative. Even if you are adding energy into the flow to try to "decrease" your dissipation in the boundary layer, you still aren't actually decreasing it. Sure, you might measure less dissipation, but that is only because you are putting energy back into the flow to help make up for it, not because you are actually fundamentally changing the dissipation occurring in the system.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top