Flux of constant magnetic field through lateral surface of cylinder

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic flux through the lateral surface of a cylinder in a constant magnetic field. Participants are exploring how the orientation of the cylinder affects the flux calculation and whether it is possible to determine the flux without specific orientation details.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning how the orientation of the cylinder influences the flux calculation, particularly whether the flux can be determined without knowing the cylinder's orientation. There is a discussion about the implications of the magnetic field being constant and the symmetry of the cylinder.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. Some have suggested that the flux through the lateral surface may be zero due to symmetry, while others are asking for more rigorous arguments and clarifications regarding the flux through the ends of the cylinder.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the vector that defines the axis of the cylinder, and participants are considering the implications of this axis on the flux calculations. The discussion also touches on the need for a more formalized argument regarding the assumptions made about the magnetic field and the cylinder's orientation.

lorenz0
Messages
151
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
In a region of space there is a constant magnetic field ##\vec{B}=B(3,2,1)##, where ##B## is constant. What is the flux of the magnetic field through the lateral surface of a cylinder present in that region of space?
Relevant Equations
##\phi_{S\text{ closed}}(\vec{B})=\int_{S\text{ closed}}\vec{B}\cdot d\vec{S}=0##
If the question had been asking about the flux through the whole surface of the cylinder I would have said that the flux is 0, but since it is asking only about the lateral surfaces I am wondering how one could calculate such a flux not knowing how the cylinder is oriented in space. One could for example take a cylinder whose axis lies on the line spanned by the vector ##(3,2,1)## and say that the flux through the lateral surface of the cylinder is 0. So, the answer in this case depends on the orientation of the cylinder in space, am I right?
Or is there a way to find out the flux even without knowing anything more specific about the cylinder?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have (correctly) deduced that the flux through the full cylinder surface is zero. What can you say about the flux through the ends of the cylinder?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lorenz0
Orodruin said:
You have (correctly) deduced that the flux through the full cylinder surface is zero. What can you say about the flux through the ends of the cylinder?
That the flux through one is the opposite of the flux through the other in the case that I have described where the axis of the cylinder lies on the line spanned by the vector ##(3,2,1)## but can I say anything more without knowing something more about the orientation of the cylinder in space?
 
lorenz0 said:
That the flux through one is the opposite of the flux through the other in the case that I have described where the axis of the cylinder lies on the line spanned by the vector ##(3,2,1)## but can I say anything more without knowing something more about the orientation of the cylinder in space?
Why only if the cylinder lies on that axis?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lorenz0
Orodruin said:
Why only if the cylinder lies on that axis?
Ah, thinking more about it, could I say that since the ##\vec{B}##-field is constant across space and since the cylinder is symmetric I would have that the flux through the lateral surface of the cylinder is ##0##, because when "entering" the cylinder it has a plus sign and when "exiting" through the other end it has a - sign and the same magnitude. Does this make sense?
 
I don't think that is very rigorous. Can you make your argument more formalised?
 
lorenz0 said:
Ah, thinking more about it, could I say that since the ##\vec{B}##-field is constant across space and since the cylinder is symmetric I would have that the flux through the lateral surface of the cylinder is ##0##, because when "entering" the cylinder it has a plus sign and when "exiting" through the other end it has a - sign and the same magnitude. Does this make sense?
You might consider revisiting @Orodruin's question in post #2. You have established that the flux through the entire cylinder is zero regardless of the cylinder's orientation. If you can show that the flux through the two flat ends is also zero regardless of the cylinder's orientation, then ##\dots##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
It also might help you to visualize this by taking a cylinder like object such as a coffee mug and holding it up against a light.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K