Flux of magnetic moment into a coil

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the magnetic flux induced by a magnetic moment placed at the center of a coil, specifically a circular loop. The initial attempt to integrate the magnetic field resulted in a non-converging integral, prompting a reevaluation that led to a correct expression for the flux at the center. When the magnetic moment is offset from the loop center, the resulting integral becomes significantly more complex, and the user is unable to find a closed form for the double integral. The thread seeks insights on whether this problem has been previously solved or if numerical integration is the only viable option. The user expresses a need for guidance on the integration challenges faced.
flying_fred
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've an experiment in which I've some magnetic material place into a coil that's used as sensor. Say it's a cylindrical one for the sake of simplicity.
I'm trying to evaluate the flux induced by the material into the coil so that I can optimize the coil parameters (size, position and later its shape).
The material magnetization is given as a function of position.
To start as simple as possible I'm trying to evaluate the flux induced by a small magnetic moment placed at the center of a circular loop, the moment being perpendicular to the loop plane. Then I'll integrate it over the whole coil, then over the whole material volume.

The moment axial component is given at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_moment#Magnetic_field_produced_by_a_magnetic_moment"

The problem I'm facing is that the integral over the loop surface doesn't converge.
Setting z=0, y=0 and x=r, then integrating 2 pi r Bz[r,0,0] over the [0,R] interval we get
\Phi =\int_0^R \frac{\mu \mu_{0}}{2 r^2} \, dr

which obviously does not converge.

What am I missing?

Thanks for any hint,
Fred.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, replying to myself...

then the
\Phi =\int_0^R \frac{\mu \mu_{0}}{2 r^2} \, dr

integral does not converge but the full function Bz[x,y,z] (with x=r and y=0) is integrable on the disk and gives:

\Phi =\int_0^R \frac{{3\mu \mu_{0}}}{4\pi } \cdot \frac{z^2-\frac{1}{3}\left(x^2+y^2+z^2\right)}{\left(x^2+y^2+z^2\right)^{\frac{5}{2}}} \cdot 2\pi r \, dr =\int_0^R \frac{{3\mu \mu_{0}}}{4\pi } \cdot \frac{z^2-\frac{1}{3}\left(r^2+z^2\right)}{\left(r^2+z^2\right)^{\frac{5}{2}}} \cdot 2\pi r \, dr

which simplifies to :

\Phi =\int_0^R \frac{{\mu \mu_{0}}}{2} \cdot \frac{\left2 z^2-r^2\right}{\left(r^2+z^2\right)^{\frac{5}{2}}} \cdot r \, dr

and nicely integrates to:

\Phi = \frac{ {\mu \mu_0}}{2} \frac{R^2}{\left(R^2+z^2\right)^{3/2}}

yielding the simple

\Phi = \frac{ {\mu \mu_0}}{2R} at z=0.
If now the magnetic moment is set at a d offset from the loop center, say on the x axis, the expression is much more complex and, still integrating over a disk centered at x=y=0, the Bz[x,y,z] field component becomes:

{Bz}[r {Cos}[\theta ]-d,r {Sin}[\theta ],z]

and the surface integral is now:

\Phi = \int_0^R \int_0^{2\,\pi\right} \frac{{3\mu \mu_0}}{4\pi } \cdot \frac{z^2-\frac{1}{3}\left((r{Cos}[\theta ]-d)^2+r^2 {Sin^2}[\theta ]+z^2\right)}{\left((r{Cos}[\theta ]-d)^2+r^2 {Sin^2}[\theta ]+z^2\right)^{\frac{5}{2}}} \cdot 2\pi r \, dr

which simplifies to:

\Phi = \int_0^R \int_0^{2\,\pi\right} \frac{\mu\,\mu_0}{2} \cdot \frac{\left d^2+r^2-2 z^2+2\, d\, r\, \text{Cos}[\theta ]\right}{\left(d^2+r^2+z^2+2\, d\, r\, \text{Cos}[\theta ]\right)^{5/2}}\cdot r \, d\theta\, dr

At this point I'm stuck and I can't find any closed form for that double integral.

Anyone knowing if it's already been solved (and where) or if numeric integration is the only resort there?

Thanks in advance,
Fred.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top