Foca length of a concave mirror

AI Thread Summary
A concave mirror with a focal length of 10 cm in air has its focal length altered when placed in a liquid with a refractive index of 1.2. The depth of the liquid is 7.5 cm, but due to the refractive properties of the liquid, the rays do not converge to a single focal point. Instead, the actual focus is located 2.5 cm from the water surface, and the apparent focal point cannot be determined as the rays refract away from the normal. The discussion highlights that the angles of reflection remain unaffected by the refractive index, leading to the conclusion that there is no definitive focal point in this scenario. Overall, the interaction of light rays with the liquid complicates the mirror's focal properties.
Steven7
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A concave mirror of focal length 10cm in air is put into a beaker containing a liquid up to 7.5cm. Refractive index of the liquid is 1.2. What is the focal length of the mirror inside the beaker?

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried proportion method:
Depth Focal length
7.5cm 10cm
6.25cm(Apparent depth) 8.33cm
But I'm not convinced that this method is a legal operation. Any other way I could find the new f for the mirror?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The angle of reflection is equal to the angle of incidence.
 
Well any more hints? I can't think of any equation finding new f using angles.
 
For an assigned question it's peculiar. Is it a trick question? Do you notice that the angles of reflection are independent of the index of refraction? It's a mirror not a lens.

The light rays change medium at the water surface. This is where the index of refraction counts. The distance traveled in water is variable; "up to 7.5 cm."
 
If there were no water, the parallel beam of light would have come to focus at 10 cm from the mirror. But because of water, after 7.5 cm, the rays will refract away from the normal and come to focus nearer to the water surface. Actual distance of the focus from the water surface 2.5 cm. Apparent position of the focus is d.
So refractive index = 2.5/d.
 
It can be shown, without arduous geometric or algebraic proof, that the rays passing through the water surface will not meet at a point. There is no focal point.

To show this, consider the angle of total internal reflection. For n2/n1=1.2, the angle of this ray within the water is 56.44 degrees from a normal line passing through the surface. In the air, the ray proceeds at 90 degrees from the normal, grazing the water surface.

Compare this to the ray reflected from the center of the mirror. It passes through the water at zero degrees from normal and is undeflected. It meets the other ray at an altitude of zero cm. above the water.

Consider any other ray between zero and 56.44 degrees. It will meet the normal ray, from the mirror's center, at some finite, non-zero distance above the water's surface. All three rays do not converge to a point.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top