That depends on the exact height and length of the barrier as well as the energy of the incident particles. For a given height and length of the barrier you can find an energy less than the height of the barrier for which either particle would have a transmission probability of 1 and the other particle would have something less than 1.
You can see a decent treatment of the problem on Wikipedia. Take a look at the form of the transmission coefficient T for the case E<V_0. If you choose k_1 such that \sin(k_1 a) = 0 then the transmission coefficient will be 1. k_1 depends on the mass of the particle and the difference between the height of the barrier and the energy of the particle.
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
I don't know why the electrons in atoms are considered in the orbitals while they could be in sates which are superpositions of these orbitals? If electrons are in the superposition of these orbitals their energy expectation value is also constant, and the atom seems to be stable!