For those about to go Surfing tomorrow?Big-Bang new perspective?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ranyart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perspective
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores a new perspective on the Big Bang theory, suggesting that if observers were positioned in different galaxies, they would still perceive the Milky Way as receding, implying it could be viewed as the center of the Big Bang. This notion challenges the traditional understanding that the Big Bang originated from a singular point in space, proposing instead that each galaxy could have its own Big Bang event. Critics argue that this perspective relies on an incomplete dataset, as it assumes the Milky Way's significance over other galaxies. The conversation also touches on the idea that the Big Bang could be a universal phenomenon occurring at every point in space. Ultimately, the discussion encourages open-mindedness and a reevaluation of established cosmic models.
ranyart
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
Somthing to ponder during a quite moment, the theorized Big-Bang is the cornerstone of our Universe model, a beginning?..where we evolved from, the Ultimate reference point, the singularity at the beginning of the Universe.

If we use some different perspectives we can base models on what we try to understand, well here is something nobody has considered.

We look out from our Galaxy, we see..millions of other Galaxies..we take it on trust that these Galaxies are real, the data received tells us that all are receeding from our observational point of view, there are analogies that Galaxies are moving away from us as if on a surface of a balloon.

There are millions of other Galaxies, some close by some at far off locations, all experience the same 'effect', so if we were in a different Galaxy, then we should see exactly the same Universe as if from our Milky Way, the Big-Bang model would still persist.

What if we could collectivly be in every 'other' Galaxy except the Milky Way? and fix our stare at the Milky Way...what do we now see?..think about this for a while.

Instead of the Big-Bang being the evasive un-identifiable theoretical unobserved location, we would have to conclude that every Galaxy was co-moving away from this location(milky-Way), and this is the location of the Big-Bang!

Just by taking a co-collective view one can alter the model in that a singlularity is fixed to the Milky Way, the Laws of physics would be the same.

A deeper question can evolve from this simplistic view, what if there is a Big-Bang coupled to every Galaxy anyway?..all of Einsteins Equations state this, our singularity is coupled to the appearance of our Galaxy, Big Bangs are just the appearence of individual Galaxies, the truth is coming, open your mind,think outside the box.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi ranyart

Originally posted by ranyart
What if we could collectivly be in every 'other' Galaxy except the Milky Way? and fix our stare at the Milky Way...what do we now see?..think about this for a while.

Instead of the Big-Bang being the evasive un-identifiable theoretical unobserved location, we would have to conclude that every Galaxy was co-moving away from this location(milky-Way), and this is the location of the Big-Bang!

Each observer, except those in the Local Group, would see the Milky Way moving away from their location.

But that would be putting on huge blinders to the rest of the universe (by only looking at the Milky Way). So the conclusion is based on a incomplete/faulty dataset/premise. It assumes a priori that the Milky Way is the most significant galaxy in the universe. Upon further review, one would see that the conclusion could be applied to any galaxy in the universe.

It also contradicts Big Bang Theory in that galaxies were not spewed out from a central point in space.

A deeper question can evolve from this simplistic view, what if there is a Big-Bang coupled to every Galaxy anyway?

Now this is right back on track! :smile: According to the theory, the Big Bang did happen at every point in space. So, it looks like your thought process did point you in the right direction (pun intended).
 
Older Galaxies At Big Bang Start-Up??

Hi everyone!
New person...have you seen this??
http://
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome to Physics Forums Why!

As always, the annual AAS meeting saw lots of interesting presentations and posters - were you there? - and the USA Today article on distant galaxies is quite topical. In fact, there is at least one thread here on this topic already.

The article also gives a couple of 'Guiness Book of Records' type entries - the most intrinsically luminous star, and the 'fastest'. Good subjects for Astronomy thread!
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top