Voltage Confusion: What Am I Missing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jaccobtw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Voltage
AI Thread Summary
Voltage is related to the electric potential energy between charged particles, where decreasing distance increases voltage due to the inverse relationship in the equation V = k*q/r. While increasing distance does require more work to separate charges, it also means that the potential energy increases as the distance increases. The confusion arises from the distinction between voltage, which is energy per unit charge, and the work done in moving charges in an electric field. Understanding these concepts clarifies how voltage behaves in relation to distance and charge interactions. The discussion highlights the importance of grasping electric potential and its implications in electrostatics.
Jaccobtw
Messages
163
Reaction score
32
Homework Statement
For two oppositely charged particles, does the distance between them increase or decrease voltage?
Relevant Equations
V = kq/r
I'm confused about voltage. According to this equation, decreasing distance would increase the voltage between two oppositely charge particles, but doesn't increasing the distance increase the potetnial energy between the two particles because the amount of work done would increase with distance, correct? It takes more energy to separate a charge a greater amount of distance increasing the voltage. Also the particles would have greater kinetic energy beginning from a larger distance.. What am I not understanding here? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
Jaccobtw said:
I'm confused about voltage.
Perhaps it helps to consider the electric potential field as energy per unit of charge.

Jaccobtw said:
According to this equation, decreasing distance would increase the voltage between two oppositely charge particles,
And not talk of voltage between particles.

So a single charge ##q_1##, located at the origin of a coordinate system, has an electric field potential associated in space according to ##V = {k\,q_1\over r}##.

To bring a test charge ##q_2## (a second charge) from infinity to a position at distance ##r## from the origin requires an energy of ##q_2V =
{k\,q_1q_2\over r}##.
I.e. work has to be done to do this if the charges are of opposite sign.

[edit] OOPS! Someone should have jumped on this !
I.e. work has to be done to do this if the charges are of the same sign.

##\ ##
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top