Voltage Confusion: What Am I Missing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jaccobtw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Voltage
AI Thread Summary
Voltage is related to the electric potential energy between charged particles, where decreasing distance increases voltage due to the inverse relationship in the equation V = k*q/r. While increasing distance does require more work to separate charges, it also means that the potential energy increases as the distance increases. The confusion arises from the distinction between voltage, which is energy per unit charge, and the work done in moving charges in an electric field. Understanding these concepts clarifies how voltage behaves in relation to distance and charge interactions. The discussion highlights the importance of grasping electric potential and its implications in electrostatics.
Jaccobtw
Messages
163
Reaction score
32
Homework Statement
For two oppositely charged particles, does the distance between them increase or decrease voltage?
Relevant Equations
V = kq/r
I'm confused about voltage. According to this equation, decreasing distance would increase the voltage between two oppositely charge particles, but doesn't increasing the distance increase the potetnial energy between the two particles because the amount of work done would increase with distance, correct? It takes more energy to separate a charge a greater amount of distance increasing the voltage. Also the particles would have greater kinetic energy beginning from a larger distance.. What am I not understanding here? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
Jaccobtw said:
I'm confused about voltage.
Perhaps it helps to consider the electric potential field as energy per unit of charge.

Jaccobtw said:
According to this equation, decreasing distance would increase the voltage between two oppositely charge particles,
And not talk of voltage between particles.

So a single charge ##q_1##, located at the origin of a coordinate system, has an electric field potential associated in space according to ##V = {k\,q_1\over r}##.

To bring a test charge ##q_2## (a second charge) from infinity to a position at distance ##r## from the origin requires an energy of ##q_2V =
{k\,q_1q_2\over r}##.
I.e. work has to be done to do this if the charges are of opposite sign.

[edit] OOPS! Someone should have jumped on this !
I.e. work has to be done to do this if the charges are of the same sign.

##\ ##
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top