For what Z values does an atom begin to differ from a nonrelativistic model?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hb1547
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom Model
hb1547
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Relativistic effects are rather small in the hydrogen atom, but not so in higher-Z atoms. Estimate at what value of Z relativistic effects might alter energies by about a percent and whether it applies equally to all orbiting electrons or to some more than others. For this crude guess, it is acceptable to combine quantum mechanical results you have learned, related to energy, angular momentum, and/or probable radii, with some classical relationships."

My professor also added the note:
"You can consider the electrons to be orbiting in*a circular*orbit according to the Bohr model. Ignore screening in your calculation, but mention what effect it would have on a more realistic calculation."

Homework Equations


E_{n} = -E_{0}\frac{Z^{2}}{n^{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution


Just generally not sure where to begin with this. Do I look at it from a Bohr model standpoint, and try to find a point where Gamma becomes 1.01? Do I look at it from a quantum mechanical view, and try to use quantum numbers to find an energy level high enough that implies an electron is going a certain speed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would do the latter, the equation you posted is a good one, you have to be able to relate the Energy of the orbiting electron with its velocity; you can plug in gamma = 1.01 the relativistic momentum equation and use:
image012.gif

to find the corresponding energy, then plug that into E in the equation you posted and Z=1 for hydrogen and solve for n!

Also, do you go to UC Santa Cruz? It sounds like you're in the same class as me... ;)
 

Attachments

  • image012.gif
    image012.gif
    252 bytes · Views: 399
Gotta love Professor Smith
 
Yeah, he's pretty awesome.

(Also, that equation I gave is for total E, you need KE and it's actually way easier to use KE = (gamma)mc2-mc2, you don't need to calculate momentum or velocity)
 
Awesome thanks! That helped a lot -- that was a much simpler problem than I was making it in my head. Thanks again, good luck on tomorrows quiz, haha
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top