MHB For which c is there 1/0 solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! 😊

I am looking the following:

Solve for a fix number $c\in \mathbb{R}$ the following linear system of equations: $$\begin{cases}x_1-cx_2+(2c-1)x_3=-(c+1) \\ 3x_2+(5c+8)x_3=-(c-2)\end{cases}$$
For which values of $c$ is there one solution and for which values are there no solution? I have done the following:

First we write this in matrix form:
\begin{equation*}\begin{pmatrix}\left.\begin{matrix}1 & -c & 2c-1 \\ 0 & 3 & 5c+8 \end{matrix}\right|\begin{matrix}-(c+1) \\ -(c-2)\end{matrix}\end{pmatrix}\end{equation*}
It is already in echelon form.

This at the second line we have "$3$" which doesn't depend on $c$, then the case "No solution"doesn't occur, right?

Since the second line cannotbe a multiple of the first one,we conclude that we always have One solution.

Is that correct?

:unsure:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey mathmari!

From the second equation, we can write $x_2$ as a function of $x_3$, which will indeed have at least 1 solution due to the non-zero coefficient $3$.
After that we can always find $x_1$ from the first equation as a function of $x_2$ and $x_3$.
So we will always have infinitely many solutions, won't we? 🤔

Looking at it geometrically, we have the intersection of 2 planes.
Those are actual planes since the coefficients of each cannot all be zero, regardless of the value of $c$.
They can either coincide, or be parallel (no solutions), or intersect in a line.
Since the coefficients in the second line cannot be a multiple of the coefficients in the first line, we can conclude that those planes do not coincide, and they are not parallel either.
That leaves that the solution must be a line, which means we have infinitely many solutions. 🤔
 
Last edited:
Klaas van Aarsen said:
From the second equation, we can write $x_2$ as a function of $x_3$, which will indeed have at least 1 solution due to the non-zero coefficient $3$.
After that we can always find $x_1$ from the first equation as a function of $x_2$ and $x_3$.
So we will always have infinitely many solutions, won't we? 🤔

Looking at it geometrically, we have the intersection of 2 planes.
Those are actual planes since the coefficients of each cannot all be zero, regardless of the value of $c$.
They can either coincide, or be parallel (no solutions), or intersect in a line.
Since the coefficients in the second line cannot be a multiple of the coefficients in the first line, we can conclude that those planes do not coincide, and they are not parallel either.
That leaves that the solution must be a line, which means we have infinitely many solutions. 🤔

I see! Thank you! (Handshake)
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
2K
Back
Top