MHB For which integers x,y is (4-6*sqrt(2))^2 = x+y*sqrt(2)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter danielw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers
danielw
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi All

I have the following question.View attachment 5866

I have reviewed my notes but have not been able to crack this.

I tried two different ways, both wrong.

First:

$$
(4-6*\sqrt2)^2=$$

$$16-24*\sqrt2-24*\sqrt2+(36*2)

= 88-218*\sqrt2$$

so, $x=88$ and

$y=218$My second method was

$$(4-6*\sqrt2)^2= 4^2-(6*2)=28$$

but this is not in the form they want.

I'd really appreciate some advice on how to go about solving this kind of problem.

Thanks!

Daniel
 

Attachments

  • intergers.PNG
    intergers.PNG
    2.3 KB · Views: 94
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think your first method is the way I would use, so that the LHS of the equation is in the form $a+b\sqrt{2}$:

$$(4-6\sqrt{2})^2=x+y\sqrt{2}$$

$$16-48\sqrt{2}+72=x+y\sqrt{2}$$

$$88-48\sqrt{2}=x+y\sqrt{2}$$

And so we see that:

$$(x,y)=(88,-48)$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top