Force acting on bob of Foucault's pendulum

  • Thread starter Thread starter bksree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The Foucault pendulum at the North Pole oscillates from west to east, with forces acting on the bob causing a clockwise rotation of the pendulum's plane. Despite the changing direction of the Coriolis force, the pendulum's plane rotates consistently due to the Earth's rotation beneath it. Observers on Earth perceive the bob's motion as unexpected because the pendulum's path does not follow a straight line in a rotating reference frame. The forces acting on the bob do not cancel out its displacement; rather, they affect its velocity, allowing the plane to advance at a constant rate. This consistent clockwise rotation is a result of the Earth's continuous rotation relative to the pendulum's motion.
bksree
Messages
75
Reaction score
2
Hi
Assume that the Foucault's pendulum is located in N pole and is oscillating from W to E (x direction). The Z axis is vertically up. The force acting on the bob as it moves from equilibrium position towards E is in the -y direction causing the plane of the pendulum to rotate in CW direction (as viewed from above). When the bob retraces its movement (from E to equilibrium position) the force is in the + y direction, i.e. opposite to the previous case.
Then how does the plane of the pendulum rotate in a consistent manner (i.e. clockwise)

TIA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The plane of the pendulum rotates in a consistent manner because the Earth rotates in a consistent manner. Relative to an imaginary line on the ground marking the initial shadow of the pendulum bob,the new shadow of the bob(or in other words, the plane of the pendulum) will turn clockwise with time.
 
dreamLord said:
The plane of the pendulum rotates in a consistent manner because the Earth rotates in a consistent manner. Relative to an imaginary line on the ground marking the initial shadow of the pendulum bob,the new shadow of the bob(or in other words, the plane of the pendulum) will turn clockwise with time.

I agree that this is what is observed. The question is why ? if the coriolis force, which causes the plane to rotate, changes direction as mentioned above.
 
Last edited:
Just a comment about your choice of using directions E(ast) and W(est) to set up your experiment: If you stand at the North pole, can you point towards any direction other than South?

Wikipedia is usually a good place to begin when looking to answer the type of question you're asking. Best not to put 100% confidence in Wiki pages, but usually there is enough correct information to get a searcher started. For the Foucault pendulum there is a very good explanation of the mechanics, including pendulum behaviors at the poles, plus some good animations. Additionally there are further references if the researcher is not satisfied.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
 
Last edited:
bksree said:
I agree that this is what is observed. The question is why ? if the coriolis force, which causes the plane to rotate, changes direction as mentioned above.

My view is as follows: The coriolis force is not a real force and it depends on the frame of reference. It will just cause the path of the bob over the ground not to be a straight line. Because this is an 'ideal situation' (with uniform gravitational field over the site of the pendulum) there will be no interaction with the ground so the bob will not experience any sideways acceleration - being just attracted to the centre of the Earth at all times. What the Earth is doing , beneath the pendulum is not relevant - except that someone on the (rotating) Earth will, of course, see the bob moving in an unexpected way.
 
bksree said:
I agree that this is what is observed. The question is why ? if the coriolis force, which causes the plane to rotate, changes direction as mentioned above.

Check out this video at 1:30:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49JwbrXcPjc

For a real world Foucault's pendulum those loops you see at the end are even thinner, so it looks like a oscillation plane. But in fact there is no oscillation plane in the rotating reference frame of the Earth. The pendulum makes thin, long loops and returns to the lowest point from a slightly different direction than it left towards.

bksree said:
The force acting on the bob as it moves from equilibrium position towards E is in the -y direction causing the plane of the pendulum to rotate in CW direction (as viewed from above). When the bob retraces its movement (from E to equilibrium position) the force is in the + y direction, i.e. opposite to the previous case. Then how does the plane of the pendulum rotate in a consistent manner (i.e. clockwise)

Applying a force, and then the opposite force for the same duration doesn’t cancel the displacement, just the change in velocity. The "plane" is advancing at a constant rate, because the accelerations cancel. If they didn't cancel, it would advance faster and faster.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top