Force Analysis of a compressed spring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the confusion surrounding the forces involved when compressing a horizontally placed spring against a wall. When a force is exerted to compress the spring, the spring exerts an equal and opposite elastic force on the person, but these forces act on different bodies and do not need to be balanced. The interaction results in a pair of equal and opposite forces, which are part of the action-reaction principle. To calculate the work done on the spring, one must consider that the force may not be constant and may require integration over the distance. Ultimately, the forces involved reflect the dynamics of the interaction between the person and the spring.
Aldnoahz
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
Hi all, I am quite confused by the forces relating to a horizontlly placed spring when someone directly exerts a force to the compress it. If I exert a force F to the right to compress the spring, which, say, is placed against a wall, the spring exerts an elastic force on me but I don't see how these two forces are related because they are exerted on different bodies. How can they be balanced out if they act on different bodies?

Let me thank you in advance. I have been bothered by this problem for a while.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They don't have to be balanced. As you say, they act on different bodies so their effects may be different. The spring gets compressed and you may get some acceleration from this force unless there is friction to balance the effect of the spring on you.
 
nasu said:
They don't have to be balanced. As you say, they act on different bodies so their effects may be different. The spring gets compressed and you may get some acceleration from this force unless there is friction to balance the effect of the spring on you.

Thank you for replying. I just want some clarification. If I analyze the horizontal forces on me (assume no friction), are there two forces? One from the compressed spring and the other from the reaction force by me pushing the spring with the force F?

If I do work by exerting this force F to compress the spring, how do you calculate the work done by using force times distance formula?
 
There is one force from the spring on you. You can call it the reaction to you r force on the spring but the "reaction" is not a very useful concept.
There is the interaction between you and the spring (two bodies) and this results in a pair of equal and opposite forces, each one acting on one of the two bodies.

You don't if the force is not constant. You need to integrate over the distance. Or just read about work of elastic force and use the formula, if you did not learn calculus yet.
 
nasu said:
There is the interaction between you and the spring (two bodies) and this results in a pair of equal and opposite forces, each one acting on one of the two bodies.

But the two forces don't have to be equal; how can they satisfy the "this results in a pair of equal and opposite forces" criteria to be action-reaction pair?
 
Aldnoahz said:
But the two forces don't have to be equal; how can they satisfy the "this results in a pair of equal and opposite forces" criteria to be action-reaction pair?
Yes, they are. They are a pair of forces describing one interaction.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top