Force and potential energy function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the potential energy function U(x) for a particle influenced by a conservative force defined as F = (-Ax + Bx^5) N. In part (a), the user attempted to derive U(x) by taking the partial derivative but received incorrect feedback, indicating a need for integration instead. For part (b), they calculated the change in potential energy as -977 J and mistakenly concluded that the change in kinetic energy would be +977 J, but later realized they were approaching the problem incorrectly. The main focus is on correctly deriving the potential energy function and understanding the relationship between potential and kinetic energy changes. The user seeks clarification on the correct approach to solve part (a).
bdh2991
Messages
102
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A single conservative force acting on a particle within a system varies as = (− Ax + Bx5) N, where A and B are constants, is in Newtons, and x is in meters.

(a) Calculate the potential energy function U(x) associated with this force, taking U = 0 at x = 0. (Use any variable or symbol stated above as necessary.)
U(x) =



(b) Find the change in potential energy and change in kinetic energy as the particle moves from x = 1.90 m to x = 3.80 m. (Use any variable or symbol stated above as necessary.)



Homework Equations



F = -∇U



The Attempt at a Solution



for part a i took the partial derivative with respect to x in order to get the potential energy function in which i got the answer: U(x) = (A - 5Bx^4)i the system said it was wrong though.


for part b i took my equation in part a to find the change in potential energy and got -977J
and i figured if the change in potential was lost 977 J then the change in kinetic energy would have to be gaining 977 Joules, but i was wrong again. please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nvm i was doing it backwards and should have been integrating sorry guys
 
what was the answer

what was the answer to part A
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top