Force Between Two Conducting Spheres

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the force of repulsion between two conducting spheres compared to point charges. It is established that the force of repulsion between the spheres is less than that between point charges due to charge redistribution and induction effects when the spheres are in proximity. The charges on the conducting spheres can move, causing them to redistribute and increase the effective distance between the charges that interact, which decreases the force according to Coulomb's Law. Participants clarify that while the electric field outside a charged conducting sphere resembles that of a point charge, the interaction between the spheres alters the force experienced. The conclusion emphasizes that the presence of the conducting nature of the spheres leads to a weaker repulsive force than initially expected.
Paras Lehana
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi physicists here. :)
I've just joined the forums and here's my very first question :P :


Aakash PHYSICS JEE (Main & Advanced) Study Package - 5 & 6 (Class XII)
Chapter -
Electric Charges and Field

Assignment (page 12)
SECTION - A; Q.no - 1


The force of repulsion between two point charges is F, when they are d distance apart. If the point charges are replaced by conducting spheres each of radius r and the charge remains same. The separation between the center of sphere is d, then force of repulsion between them is

(1) Equal to F
(2) Less than F
(3) Greater than F
(4) Cannot be said

Answer - (2) Less than F

What I expected the answer to be was (1). The electric field due to a conducting sphere of charge Q is equivalent to the same due to a point charge at the center of the sphere as total charge on it appears as concentrated at the center for the points outside the charged sphere. So, the force should have remained the same.

Any suggestions?

Well, it's really nice meeting you all. :)

P.S.: I didn't think it to be a homework question. Well, if moderator thinks it is, the same can move the thread. I beg your pardon for that on the grounds that I just joined the joined the forum today.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the forums, Paras Lehana! :)

Let me try to answer your question now, and I have to say that some drawings would be helpful in explaining the situation, but I will try my best to describe everything with words. So let me know if I am not being completely clear.

You are right about the field outside of a charged conducting sphere being equivalent to the field generated by a point charge sitting at the center of the sphere. However, this concept is applicable only when the sphere is isolated from the environment.

In the present case, each sphere is not completely isolated from the environment because they are in the presence of each other. As a consequence they will interact. The fact that the two conducting spheres are charged implies that they will induce agregation of charges in certain regions of each other surfaces. To see this, think of both as spheres being negatively charged (and, therefore, will repel each other as required by the problem). These charges are free to move over the surface of their respetive spheres because we are dealing with a conductor. We can thus predict that the negative charge of one sphere will repel those of the other and tend to move and acumulate on the side of its respective sphere which is the furthest alway from the negative charges of the other sphere. Thus, if you have one sphere standing on the right and another one of the left, the negative charges of the sphere on the right will acumulate on the rightmost side of that sphere, and by symmetry, on the leftmost side of the sphere on the left. Now, we know that the amount of charge on both spheres remains the same during this process because charge is conserved. However, these charges will be further appart from each other now (when compared to the situation of point charges sitting at the geometrical center of the spheres) - and because Coulomb's Force decreases with the square of the distance, the force has to be smaller now.

I hope this helps!Zag
 
Last edited:
Zag said:
Welcome to the forums, Paras Lehana! :)In the present case, each sphere is not completely isolated from the environment because they are in the presence of each other. As a consequence they will interact.

You were damn clear Zag. Thanks mate, I got it! The charge would've been the same if the spheres were non-conducting. But here, as they're conducting, the charges can interact due to induction, right?
 
Zag said:
and because Coulomb's Force decreases with the square of the distance, the force has to be smaller now.

Why would the force be less ? It seems intuitive but what is the reason ? Yes,the distance increases ,but we simply cannot apply the inverse square law of coulombs force ,since they are not point charges .
 
Tanya Sharma said:
Why would the force be less ? It seems intuitive but what is the reason ? Yes,the distance increases ,but we simply cannot apply the inverse square law of coulombs force ,since they are not point charges .

You can consider the charge distribution on the spheres as stack of point charges. Those on one sphere interact with the other point charges on the other sphere. The presence of the metal also influences the force , the contribution of charges on the opposite sides is much less then the force in accordance with Coulomb's Law.
Have a look at that:http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2012/05/22/rspa.2012.0133.full

ehild
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Paras Lehana said:
You were damn clear Zag. Thanks mate, I got it! The charge would've been the same if the spheres were non-conducting. But here, as they're conducting, the charges can interact due to induction, right?

EDIT: Got It! Thanks, Zag!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top