Force Calculation for Upward Movement in Car Crashes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jaxson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Forces
AI Thread Summary
When a car traveling at 60 km/h hits a small concrete step, significant upward force can be generated, but calculating this force is complex due to factors like tire pressure, curb height, and wheel compression. The upward force must exceed the gravitational force of approximately 17,693 N for the car to lift off the ground. The impact redirects the car's forward velocity upward, with the vertical speed of the wheel after the collision estimated at around 14.8 m/s. The dynamics of the car's suspension play a crucial role, as they can absorb some of the impact, preventing significant lift unless the bump is substantial. Overall, precise calculations are challenging, and experimental data may provide better insights into the forces at play.
Jaxson
If the front left wheel of a car traveling at approximately 60km/h impacted with a small concrete step, would any significant amount of force be applied upwards on the car? How would you calculate this force? I'm assuming that to lift a car into the air the force applied upwards on the car would need to be higher than the force due to gravity which I calculated to be 17692.87473N with a car of mass 1797.133kg.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread closed for Moderation. Please check your Personal Messages (PMs).
 
After the PM exchange, the thread is re-opened. Thank you for your patience.
 
The force is very large for a short time. It's probably easier to work in terms of impulse than forces, because it's hard to calculate how long the force lasts. When the wheel hits the curb, it compresses and rebounds. The length of the force will depend on such things as the pressure of the tire and height of the curb and radius of the wheel.

It's really hard to get any sort of accurate result from this. But we can probably get ballpark numbers by making some spherical cow type assumptions.
Let's say the curb is 10cm high and the wheel is 50cm. Let's say the wheel compresses inward by 5cm (I have no idea how accurate these numbers are).
Untitled.png

I make the assumption that the car forward velocity is redirected upward by an angle theta by the collision. The reason for this is because the wheel compresses until it won't compress anymore, and this happens when the front of the car is moving tangentially to the wheel.
We get:
##\sin(\theta) = \frac{40cm}{45cm}##
Let w be the vertical speed of the front wheel immediately after the wheel rebounds.
##w \approx \sin(\theta)*v_0 = 40/45*60km/h = 14.8 m/s##
Now, you have to consider how much weight is on the front wheel. Probably about half the weight at first, but lower as it collides. Any damage to the car chassis will tend to reduce the vertical motion due to crumpling. The truth is, it's very hard to get even an order of magnitude accuracy with pure physics, and you are better off running experiments.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 662
The car will not be significantly slowed down as a result of this impact .

There is an effective centre of revolution located on the corner of the step and the wheel rolls up and around that centre .

The components of acceleration of the wheel as it rolls around the effective centre of revolution can be estimated from the known forward speed and the geometry of the wheel motion .
 
Jaxson said:
If the front left wheel of a car traveling at approximately 60km/h impacted with a small concrete step, would any significant amount of force be applied upwards on the car? How would you calculate this force? I'm assuming that to lift a car into the air the force applied upwards on the car would need to be higher than the force due to gravity which I calculated to be 17692.87473N with a car of mass 1797.133kg.
Bump and suspension dependent.
Something like a 2x4 and the car would drive over that with not much of a problem.
With a 4x4 sized bump. the suspension dynamics would again react quickly enough to not have the car rise very much. But chances of blowout and rim damage increases.
As the length of the bump increases, the forces from the tire and suspension being forced up, have no downward release and the car body would lift. more than before.
With no suspension, all forces are directed to the body of the vehicle.
The dynamic response of the suspension and car would have to be examined.
Maybe you have seen, maybe not as it was a few years back, an advertisement of a half ton truck traveling over a continuous set of bumps. The tires and suspension move up and down, but not the truck body. Of course, speed of the vehicle and bump placement has to be matched for this to occur.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top