Force exerted by one disc on the other in a capacitor?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force exerted by one charged disk on another in a capacitor setup. The disks have equal but opposite surface charge densities, and the relevant equations for electric field and force are provided. The initial calculations mistakenly used the total electric field instead of the field due to a single plate, leading to confusion. It is clarified that the force on one plate is determined by the electric field created by the other plate, which is half the initially calculated value. Ultimately, the correct approach involves recognizing that the distance between the plates does not affect the uniform field strength in this scenario.
mot
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two circular disks, each of area 4.10×10-4 m2, are situated parallel to one another. The distance between them is small compared with their radii. Both disks are uniformly charged; their charges per unit area are σ = 5.00×10-5 C/m2 for one and -σ = -5.00×10-5 C/m2 for the other. Compute the force exerted by one on the other.

Homework Equations


E=σ/ε
F=qE

The Attempt at a Solution


E=σ/ε=5.00×10-5 C/m2/8.85x10-12
=5.649717514x106N/C
Charge on one plate = σ*Area=5.00×10-5 C/m2*4.10×10-4 m2=2.05x108C
F=qE=2.05x108C*5.649717514x106N/C
=0.1158N

I have tried both the positive and negative version of this answer, both are wrong. I have no idea what I'm doing wrong here...the distance between the plates isn't given, so I can't use coulomb's law (but they're not point charges anyways)
Help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mot said:

Homework Statement


Two circular disks, each of area 4.10×10-4 m2, are situated parallel to one another. The distance between them is small compared with their radii. Both disks are uniformly charged; their charges per unit area are σ = 5.00×10-5 C/m2 for one and -σ = -5.00×10-5 C/m2 for the other. Compute the force exerted by one on the other.


Homework Equations


E=σ/ε
F=qE


The Attempt at a Solution


E=σ/ε=5.00×10-5 C/m2/8.85x10-12
=5.649717514x106N/C
Charge on one plate = σ*Area=5.00×10-5 C/m2*4.10×10-4 m2=2.05x108C
F=qE=2.05x108C*5.649717514x106N/C
=0.1158N

I have tried both the positive and negative version of this answer, both are wrong. I have no idea what I'm doing wrong here...the distance between the plates isn't given, so I can't use coulomb's law (but they're not point charges anyways)
Help?

While the net field between the plates is the sum of the fields created by the charges on both of the plates, the force acting on one plate is due only to the field created by the other plate. That is, the field created by a given plate does not create a force on itself.

So. The field strength to use is that due to a single plate. That field will act on the charge on the other plate.
 
mot said:
Charge on one plate = σ*Area=5.00×10-5 C/m2*4.10×10-4 m2=2.05x108C
Sign error in exponent, but looks like this was just an error in copying out.
F=qE=2.05x108C*5.649717514x106N/C
=0.1158N
That's what I get.
the distance between the plates isn't given,
When two charged plates are very close, the field is essentially perpendicular to the plates. This means there is no attenuation with distance: the field is the same everywhere between the plates. The exact distance ceases to matter
gneill said:
The field strength to use is that due to a single plate.
Right, but the question asks for the force, not the field. The product of the charges will enter into it.
 
haruspex said:
Right, but the question asks for the force, not the field. The product of the charges will enter into it.

Yes, but the field due to one plate is due to the charge on that plate. So that charge is accounted for. Then F = Eq is the force on the other plate. The OP used the intermediate step of calculating E, so I did likewise.

Of course one can replace E by the expression involving the charge on a plate. Then product of the two charges emerges.
 
gneill said:
While the net field between the plates is the sum of the fields created by the charges on both of the plates, the force acting on one plate is due only to the field created by the other plate. That is, the field created by a given plate does not create a force on itself.

Mulled this over for a little while...got it! The field strength due to one plate is half as strong as the one calculated, and then I just used F=qE as normal to get my answer.
Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top