Equilibrium and Force on Lower Hemisphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vibhor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Hemisphere
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the equilibrium of a sphere, specifically analyzing the forces acting on the lower hemisphere. It establishes that the normal force exerted by the floor is equal to 2mg, while the vertical force from the top hemisphere on the lower hemisphere is mg. The center of mass of the lower hemisphere experiences centripetal acceleration, which is factored into the force balance equation. The final calculation results in R = 5mg/8 directed downwards, confirming the analysis is correct. The participants agree on the validity of the solution presented.
Vibhor
Messages
971
Reaction score
40

Homework Statement



?temp_hash=c5e575ffb27bf1584cb626211605385d.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the fact that the sphere is in equilibrium in the 'y' direction , the force exerted by the floor N = 2mg .

Now , if I consider the lower hemisphere then , vertical force exerted by top hemisphere + weight of lower hemisphere = Normal reaction from the floor .

This means , vertical force exerted by top hemisphere on lower = mg

Should this be the total force exerted on the lower hemisphere ?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • sphere.PNG
    sphere.PNG
    30.4 KB · Views: 499
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the sphere as a whole is "in equilibrium in the y direction" since the center of mass of the sphere has no acceleration.

However, does the center of mass of the lower hemisphere have any acceleration?
 
  • Like
Likes Vibhor
TSny said:
However, does the center of mass of the lower hemisphere have any acceleration?

It has centripetal acceleration ω2r ( r=3R/8) directed towards the center of the sphere i.e in +y direction (upwards)

Taking + y to be upwards , 2mg - mg +R = mω2r , gives R = 5mg/8 downwards i.e option A)

Is that ok ??
 
Vibhor said:
It has centripetal acceleration ω2r ( r=3R/8) directed towards the center of the sphere i.e in +y direction (upwards)

Taking + y to be upwards , 2mg - mg +R = mω2r , gives R = 5mg/8 downwards i.e option A)

Is that ok ??
Yes, I believe that's all correct.
 
  • Like
Likes Vibhor
TSny said:
Yes, I believe that's all correct.

Thank you :smile:
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top