Force = mass * acceleration. A question about gears.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of bicycle gearing and acceleration. It explains that while the force applied to the pedals remains constant across different gears, the torque and external forces acting on the bike differ. In lower gears, the same internal force generates a greater external force between the road and the wheels, facilitating faster acceleration. The rotational inertia of the driven wheel also varies with the gear ratio, impacting performance. Ultimately, starting in a low gear allows for quicker acceleration compared to high gear.
pletharoe
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This question is about push bikes, but could be applied to anything with a versatile engine and a gearing mechanism.

My bike is propelled by pushing on the pedals. Whether I use a high or low gear, the force remains the same. If the force and mass remain constant, how come I can accelerate faster by starting in a low gear and working up in stead of just starting in in the high gear?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you pedal, you feel a constant force between a low gear and a high gear? I feel that the lower gears are harder to pedal...
 
The force on your pedals may remain the same for any gear, but the torque applied to your wheel varies with the overall gear ratio.
Also, the rotational inertia of the driven wheel, as seen at the driving gear, varies with the gear ratio squared.
All this transpires to make it easier to accelerate faster in low gear.

Cheers,
Terry
 
pletharoe said:
Whether I use a high or low gear, the force remains the same.
Which force? What matters for the acceleration of you+bike are the external forces on you+bike, like the force between road and wheel. In lower gears the same internal force on the pedal creates a greater external force between road and wheel, and therefore more acceleration.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top