Force needed to move a free floating object through space

In summary, you don't need any force to move an object. You only need force to accelerate an object. Once it's going, it will keep going at the same speed. So say you're trying to move a free floating planet what would the word be to get it moving
  • #1
Ryan Delaney
4
0
This is going to sound like a really simple question but i was wondering if there is an equation to calculate the force needed to move an object through outer-space

Thanks in advance
Ryan D
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
You don't need any force to move an object. You only need force to accelerate an object. Once it's going, it will keep going at the same speed.
 
  • #3
so say you're trying to move a free floating planet what would the word be to get it moving

p.s. eventually i want to be able to calculate it with all the other planets and breaking out of orbit
 
  • #4
If you apply a constant force to an object, you will get constant acceleration given by Newton's 2nd law. F = ma, where m is the mass of the object. In principle, any amount of force will get an object moving as fast as you need if given enough time. In practice, you want it done in some finite amount of time. Under constant acceleration, Δv = at. So if you have change of velocity Δv, in mind that you want to achieve in some time t, the force required is given by F = mΔv/t. In the process, you will expend at least E = (1/2)mv² of energy, which will be equal to the kinetic energy of the body. If you plan to use rockets, or something like that, you will use up a lot more energy, but in space, you rarely have a way to get around that.

For orbital motion, there are many nifty shortcuts. If you outline what you want the final problem to look like, I might have better suggestions.
 
  • #5
the basis of the problem is that i want to see if it would be possible to move a moon of Jupiter Europa to Earth orbit without creating gravitational problems but first i have to see how to get it moving and how much energy is needed then there is the planets along the way that will most likely cause more energy to be expended

does that answer your question?
 
  • #6
good insight K2.a question.how can we calculate the force exerted on an object when we only know the kinetic energy it possesses and nothing else?.

K^2 said:
If you apply a constant force to an object, you will get constant acceleration given by Newton's 2nd law. F = ma, where m is the mass of the object. In principle, any amount of force will get an object moving as fast as you need if given enough time. In practice, you want it done in some finite amount of time. Under constant acceleration, Δv = at. So if you have change of velocity Δv, in mind that you want to achieve in some time t, the force required is given by F = mΔv/t. In the process, you will expend at least E = (1/2)mv² of energy, which will be equal to the kinetic energy of the body. If you plan to use rockets, or something like that, you will use up a lot more energy, but in space, you rarely have a way to get around that.

For orbital motion, there are many nifty shortcuts. If you outline what you want the final problem to look like, I might have better suggestions.
 
  • #7
Ryan Delaney said:
the basis of the problem is that i want to see if it would be possible to move a moon of Jupiter Europa to Earth orbit without creating gravitational problems but first i have to see how to get it moving and how much energy is needed then there is the planets along the way that will most likely cause more energy to be expended

does that answer your question?
the only possible way of doing so, would be to dislodge Europa from the gravitational forces of the planet jupiter, mere than a simple nudging force...perhaps the answer lays in creating a gravitational anomaly in subspace around the object itself and then creating some type of minor implosion once the forces of gravity are counter acted, Roy C, Silva
 
  • #8
Nonsense thread locked.
 

1. What is the force needed to move a free floating object through space?

The force needed to move a free floating object through space is dependent on several factors such as the mass of the object, the velocity at which it needs to move, and any external forces acting on it.

2. How do you calculate the force needed to move a free floating object through space?

The force needed to move a free floating object through space can be calculated using Newton's second law of motion, which states that force is equal to mass multiplied by acceleration (F=ma). Therefore, the force needed to move an object is directly proportional to its mass and the acceleration required.

3. Can the force needed to move a free floating object through space be reduced?

Yes, the force needed to move a free floating object through space can be reduced by decreasing its mass or by increasing its velocity. This is because the force needed is directly proportional to the mass and acceleration, and by decreasing the mass or increasing the velocity, the acceleration required is also reduced.

4. Are there any external forces that can affect the force needed to move a free floating object through space?

Yes, external forces such as gravity, drag, and electromagnetic forces can affect the force needed to move a free floating object through space. These forces can either assist or hinder the movement of the object, and must be taken into consideration when calculating the force needed.

5. Is there a limit to the force needed to move a free floating object through space?

As long as the object is in a vacuum and there are no external forces acting on it, there is no limit to the force needed to move a free floating object through space. However, in practical applications, there may be limitations due to the capabilities of the propulsion system or the structural integrity of the object.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
318
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
35
Views
604
  • Classical Physics
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
733
Back
Top