Force of Water on L-Shaped Tank Faces

  • Thread starter Thread starter PremedBeauty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Tank Water
PremedBeauty
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
The L-shaped tank shown in Figure 14-33 is filled with water and is open at the top.

hrw7_14-33.gif



(a) If d = 5.0 m, what is the force on face A due to the water?
N (up)
(b) What is the force on face B due to the water?
N (right)

The Force of water on the face A
FA = PA*AA
= rwg hA* AA
= rwg ( 2d ) * AA
0r FA = rwg ( 2d ) * d2
putting the values we get FA = 2.5*106 N
The atmospheric force on the face A = FA= ( 1.013*105 )*( 52)
= 2.5*106 N
Therefore Net force FAnet = Fatmp + FA
FAnet = 5*106 N

b) Force on the face B due to the water alone = FB
FB = PB*AB
= rwg ( 5d /2) d2
FB = 3.1*106 N
Thus, net force on face B FBnet = Fatmp + FBnet
FBnet = 5.6*106 N

I have given the problem a try. Please confirm the answer
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll leave this problem in Advanced Physics (Instead of Intro Physics) for now, because it appears to require an integration for (b).

Premed -- why do I think you need to use integration for part (b)?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top