I Force problem - how the force interacts with time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between force, mass, and time in the context of Newton's laws of motion. It emphasizes that force is defined as F=ma, where acceleration is directly related to the net force acting on an object. The conversation highlights that while time is essential for measuring motion, it does not alter the nature of force itself; constant forces do not vary with time. The participants explore a scenario involving a triangle and a mass, questioning how acceleration is affected when considering infinite mass and forces. Ultimately, understanding the forces acting on an object is crucial for determining its acceleration, regardless of the time factor.
universal2013
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
e84aaabdfbbaf89b12c74e3ac6f17708b6ebcaad.png
Hello there, i have a confusion about the force concept itself because when i look dimensionaly i see that N = kg.m/s^2 but i do not understand how the force interacts with time. Is it just about where the object and what is the net force on it due to a reference frame at that moment ? Or knowing the time is just give us more information about force in terms of acceleration? On the image let's imagine there is a frame (x,y) = (0,0) at right bottom of the triangle and x goes left y goes upwards. Suppose we have a force acting my triangle from (x,y) = (0,y') \vec F= m.\vec a\hat x. We have two normal forces n1 and n2 which n1 is between the mass and triangle, n2 is between ground and triangle. When there is no friction i can be sure about the force should satisfy for m to not moving on the top of my triangle so they would have the same constant acceleration. If the length of the triangle goes to infinity mass goes infinity and the net force we need is about infinite too. However, since there is no friction any force applied on the object starts the motion. How am i supposed to know if the mass m would has the same acceleration ? Don't we need time to reach mass m in an infinite plane? Or the simplest question is this; Is there any difference between the force applied in a short time and in a long time?
 

Attachments

  • e84aaabdfbbaf89b12c74e3ac6f17708b6ebcaad.png
    e84aaabdfbbaf89b12c74e3ac6f17708b6ebcaad.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 886
Physics news on Phys.org
Force doesn't "interact with" time (as if they were separate things), force includes time because you use time to measure motion (acceleration).

So no, forces that are constant do not vary with time (redundant).
 
universal2013 said:
Hello there, i have a confusion about the force concept itself because when i look dimensionaly i see that N = kg.m/s^2 but i do not understand how the force interacts with time. Is it just about where the object and what is the net force on it due to a reference frame at that moment ? Or knowing the time is just give us more information about force in terms of acceleration?

Not quite sure I understand your question.

The equations of motion (for example the simpler SUVAT equations) relate displacement (s), initial and final velocity (u, v), acceleration (a) and time (t).

The acceleration (a) in the equations of motion is the same as in Newtons law F=ma where F is the net force acting on the object. You can rearrange F=ma to a=F/m and substitute it into the equation of motion to give you an equation that relates force and time.

universal2013 said:
On the image let's imagine there is a frame (x,y) = (0,0) at right bottom of the triangle and x goes left y goes upwards. Suppose we have a force acting my triangle from (x,y) = (0,y') \vec F= m.\vec a\hat x. We have two normal forces n1 and n2 which n1 is between the mass and triangle, n2 is between ground and triangle.

OK.

universal2013 said:
When there is no friction i can be sure about the force should satisfy for m to not moving on the top of my triangle so they would have the same constant acceleration.

I do not understand. Are you trying to calculate how fast the triangle has to accelerate to keep the mass m stationary with respect to the triangle?

universal2013 said:
If the length of the triangle goes to infinity mass goes infinity and the net force we need is about infinite too.

F=ma. If the triangle has infinite mass it will take an infinite force to accelerate the triangle.

However, since there is no friction any force applied on the object starts the motion.

No. F=ma and you said the mass of the triangle is infinite.

How am i supposed to know if the mass m would has the same acceleration ?

You need to analyse the forces acting on the mass m. Then use a = F/m.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top