Force question involving an asteroid and spacecraft

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving the NEAR spacecraft's interaction with the asteroid Mathilde. Key calculations include determining the asteroid's mass based on its dimensions and density, the gravitational force acting on the spacecraft at a distance of 1,200,000 meters, and the comparison of this force with that experienced on Earth. The change in momentum of the spacecraft due to the asteroid's gravity is calculated, leading to a value of 2.364 kg*m/s. The final part of the problem, estimating the spacecraft's deviation after four days, poses a challenge, with suggestions to use the change in momentum to find the new velocity component and subsequently the distance off course. The discussion highlights the complexities of applying physics concepts to real-world scenarios.
rkjul
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is a 5-part problem.

In June 1997 the NEAR spacecraft ("Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous"; see http://near.jhuapl.edu/), on its way to photograph the asteroid Eros, passed within D=1200 km of asteroid Mathilde at a speed of 10 km/s relative to the asteroid (Figure 2.34). From photos transmitted by the 805 kg spacecraft , Mathilde's size was known to be about 70 km by 50 km by 50 km. It is presumably made of rock. Rocks on Earth have a density of about 3000 kg/m3 (3 grams/cm3).

(a) Calculate the mass of the asteroid, using the simplistic assumption that it has a rectangular cross-section.

(b) Calculate the magnitude of the force of gravity acting on the spacecraft due to the asteroid, when they are the distance D=1200000 m apart.

(c) For comparison, calculate the magnitude of the force of gravity acting on the spacecraft when it was on the surface of the Earth.

(d) Estimate the change in the spacecraft 's momentum due to its interaction with the asteroid, using the following method: Instead of the actual force of gravity which acts at all distances through the 1/r^2 force law, replace it with a simple impulse from a constant force acting over a fixed time, and which is zero for all earlier and later times. Assume there is no force on the spacecraft until it is very close. Then assume that the force is equal to the maximum value you calculated in part (b) above, and that it lasts for the time required to travel a distance D=1200000 m. You can safely assume that there is no significant deviation of the spacecraft from its original path with its original velocity during this time.

(e) Using your result from part (d), make a rough estimate of how far off course the spacecraft would be after 4 days.



Homework Equations



density=mass/volume
Fgrav= -G*[(m1m2)/(r)^2]
f=mg
deltap=Fnet*(deltat)
deltaposition=velocityavg*(deltat)

The Attempt at a Solution



Alright, I got the first 3 parts fairly easily by plugging and chugging into the first 3 equations. It took me a bit longer to figure out part d but I used 1200000m for change of position and set that equal to 10000m/s * deltat like this and solved for delta t in seconds:

1200000=10000*(deltat)

I came up with 120 seconds which I know is the correct answer and then I used that time in the equation for change of momentum and multiplied by the force I obtained in part b, 1.97e-2 N.

deltap=(1.97x10^-2)*120

I got 2.364 kg*m/s.

Part e is where I'm stumped. I'm not sure how to use the CHANGE in momentum to determine where the spacecraft will be as I don't know the final momentum of the spacecraft . Do I need to draw a right triangle for this part of the problem and figure out the answer that way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure... but I think maybe, assume the change in momentum is perpendicular to the original velocity. So this new velocity component (which you can get from the change in momentum you calculated) * time... equals distance off course?
 
I got it by using deltap=mass*deltav and solving for deltav, then multiplying by deltat (4 days and doing appropriate coversion). I had been working on this assignment for a long time. It's funny how you can sometimes get a brain cramp over fairly simple things.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top